BKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Halliburton has a net margin of 16.01% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 10.96%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 18.58% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $50.32, signalling upside risk potential of 37.27%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $33.04 which suggests that it could grow by 63.02%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.349%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Baker Hughes's net income of $1.2B is higher than Halliburton's net income of $615M. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.30x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 7.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.32x versus 0.78x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextDecade has a net margin of 16.01% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of --. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 18.58% beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $50.32, signalling upside risk potential of 37.27%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $11.33 which suggests that it could grow by 65.21%. Given that NextDecade has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe NextDecade is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.047%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. Baker Hughes's net income of $1.2B is higher than NextDecade's net income of $65.7M. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.30x while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.32x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of 16.01% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 11.8%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 18.58% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $50.32, signalling upside risk potential of 37.27%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $51.98 which suggests that it could grow by 59.74%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.846%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $9.3B. Baker Hughes's net income of $1.2B is higher than Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.30x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 10.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.32x versus 1.29x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Targa Resources has a net margin of 16.01% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 7.97%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 18.58% beat Targa Resources's return on equity of 29.27%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $50.32, signalling upside risk potential of 37.27%. On the other hand Targa Resources has an analysts' consensus of $217.62 which suggests that it could grow by 33.98%. Given that Baker Hughes has higher upside potential than Targa Resources, analysts believe Baker Hughes is more attractive than Targa Resources.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Targa Resources has a beta of 1.751, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.072%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Targa Resources offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Targa Resources pays out 46.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Targa Resources quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Baker Hughes's net income of $1.2B is higher than Targa Resources's net income of $351M. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.30x while Targa Resources's PE ratio is 28.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.32x versus 2.19x for Targa Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.