SLB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Halliburton has a net margin of 12.95% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 10.02%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.73% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $55.61, signalling upside risk potential of 44.83%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $37.13 which suggests that it could grow by 33.89%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Halliburton.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.912, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.19%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Halliburton offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Schlumberger pays 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.2B, which are larger than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.2B is higher than Halliburton's net income of $571M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.35x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 9.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.54x versus 1.07x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 12.95% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 16.9%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.73% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.01%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $55.61, signalling upside risk potential of 44.83%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $26.53 which suggests that it could fall by -5.64%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.748%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Schlumberger pays 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 105.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kinder Morgan's is not.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.2B, which are larger than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.2B is higher than Kinder Morgan's net income of $625M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.35x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 24.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.54x versus 4.12x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of 12.95% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of -72.12%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.73% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -18.89%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $55.61, signalling upside risk potential of 44.83%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.76%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 2.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.534%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Patterson-UTI Energy offers a yield of 3.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Schlumberger pays 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.2B, which are larger than Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.2B is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$978.8M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.35x while Patterson-UTI Energy's PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.54x versus 0.60x for Patterson-UTI Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weatherford International PLC has a net margin of 12.95% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 11.14%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.73% beat Weatherford International PLC's return on equity of 49.62%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $55.61, signalling upside risk potential of 44.83%. On the other hand Weatherford International PLC has an analysts' consensus of $111.00 which suggests that it could grow by 53.55%. Given that Weatherford International PLC has higher upside potential than Schlumberger, analysts believe Weatherford International PLC is more attractive than Schlumberger.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weatherford International PLC has a beta of 1.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.271%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Weatherford International PLC offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Schlumberger pays 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Weatherford International PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.2B, which are larger than Weatherford International PLC quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.2B is higher than Weatherford International PLC's net income of $157M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.35x while Weatherford International PLC's PE ratio is 10.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.54x versus 0.98x for Weatherford International PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.