SLB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron has a net margin of 9.39% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 7.59%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 19.04% beat Chevron's return on equity of 10.01%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 43.71%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $162.46 which suggests that it could grow by 18.85%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Chevron, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Chevron.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.056, which suggesting that the stock is 5.627% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.684%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $46.1B. Schlumberger's net income of $797M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.5B. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.20x while Chevron's PE ratio is 15.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.30x versus 1.27x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of 9.39% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 3.77%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 19.04% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 43.71%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $29.12 which suggests that it could grow by 48.62%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Schlumberger, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Schlumberger.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.056, which suggesting that the stock is 5.627% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.186, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.638%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Schlumberger's net income of $797M is higher than Halliburton's net income of $204M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.20x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 8.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.30x versus 0.76x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 9.39% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 16.91%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 19.04% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.13%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 43.71%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.14 which suggests that it could grow by 7.48%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.056, which suggesting that the stock is 5.627% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.741%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Schlumberger's net income of $797M is higher than Kinder Morgan's net income of $717M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.20x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 24.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.30x versus 4.02x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 9.39% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 9.52%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 19.04% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 43.71%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $123.65 which suggests that it could grow by 20.87%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.056, which suggesting that the stock is 5.627% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.105%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Schlumberger's net income of $797M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.20x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.30x versus 1.32x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.