OII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

TechnipFMC PLC has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of 9.49%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 22.05% beat TechnipFMC PLC's return on equity of 26.91%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.17%. On the other hand TechnipFMC PLC has an analysts' consensus of $34.23 which suggests that it could grow by 16.07%. Given that Oceaneering International has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC PLC, analysts believe Oceaneering International is more attractive than TechnipFMC PLC.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.937, which suggesting that the stock is 93.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TechnipFMC PLC has a beta of 1.138, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.787%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TechnipFMC PLC offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC PLC pays out 10.19% of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $713.5M, which are smaller than TechnipFMC PLC quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Oceaneering International's net income of $56.1M is lower than TechnipFMC PLC's net income of $224.7M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.63x while TechnipFMC PLC's PE ratio is 15.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.76x versus 1.43x for TechnipFMC PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of 10.96%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 22.05% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.17%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $34.16 which suggests that it could grow by 52.55%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.937, which suggesting that the stock is 93.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.349%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $713.5M, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Oceaneering International's net income of $56.1M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $615M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.63x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 7.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.76x versus 0.86x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of 16.73%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 22.05% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.23%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.17%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.35 which suggests that it could grow by 9.5%. Given that Oceaneering International has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Oceaneering International is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.937, which suggesting that the stock is 93.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.499%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $713.5M, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4B. Oceaneering International's net income of $56.1M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $667M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.63x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 23.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.76x versus 4.08x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextDecade has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of --. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 22.05% beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.17%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $11.33 which suggests that it could grow by 56.54%. Given that NextDecade has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe NextDecade is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.937, which suggesting that the stock is 93.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.047%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $713.5M, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. Oceaneering International's net income of $56.1M is lower than NextDecade's net income of $65.7M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.63x while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.76x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.