OII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Laboratories has a net margin of 6.07% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of 8.74%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 21.26% beat Core Laboratories's return on equity of 10.93%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $27.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.44%. On the other hand Core Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $20.71 which suggests that it could grow by 11.69%. Given that Core Laboratories has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Core Laboratories is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.392, which suggesting that the stock is 139.182% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories has a beta of 2.388, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.847%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Core Laboratories offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories pays out 5.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $679.8M, which are larger than Core Laboratories quarterly revenues of $134.4M. Oceaneering International's net income of $41.2M is higher than Core Laboratories's net income of $11.7M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while Core Laboratories's PE ratio is 31.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 1.01x versus 1.58x for Core Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nine Energy Service has a net margin of 6.07% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of -7.34%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 21.26% beat Nine Energy Service's return on equity of --.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $27.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.44%. On the other hand Nine Energy Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1.01%. Given that Oceaneering International has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Oceaneering International is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.392, which suggesting that the stock is 139.182% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 250.441%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nine Energy Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nine Energy Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $679.8M, which are larger than Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues of $138.2M. Oceaneering International's net income of $41.2M is higher than Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while Nine Energy Service's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 1.01x versus 0.06x for Nine Energy Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ProPetro Holding has a net margin of 6.07% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of -37.98%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 21.26% beat ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -14.27%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $27.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.44%. On the other hand ProPetro Holding has an analysts' consensus of $10.56 which suggests that it could grow by 15.67%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.392, which suggesting that the stock is 139.182% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProPetro Holding has a beta of 2.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.621%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProPetro Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProPetro Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $679.8M, which are larger than ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues of $360.9M. Oceaneering International's net income of $41.2M is higher than ProPetro Holding's net income of -$137.1M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while ProPetro Holding's PE ratio is 26.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 1.01x versus 0.68x for ProPetro Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Targa Resources has a net margin of 6.07% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of 10.06%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 21.26% beat Targa Resources's return on equity of 28.18%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $27.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.44%. On the other hand Targa Resources has an analysts' consensus of $198.41 which suggests that it could grow by 11.62%. Given that Targa Resources has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Targa Resources is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.392, which suggesting that the stock is 139.182% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Targa Resources has a beta of 2.281, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.053%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Targa Resources offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Targa Resources pays out 31.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Targa Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $679.8M, which are smaller than Targa Resources quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Oceaneering International's net income of $41.2M is lower than Targa Resources's net income of $387.4M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while Targa Resources's PE ratio is 32.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 1.01x versus 2.44x for Targa Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.