XIACY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

9F has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of --. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat 9F's return on equity of 0.22%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 9F has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11874.23%. Given that 9F has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe 9F is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 9F has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.998%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 9F offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 9F pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than 9F quarterly revenues of --. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than 9F's net income of --. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.76x while 9F's PE ratio is 9.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 2.60x versus 0.44x for 9F. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of --. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat Jianzhi Education Technology Group's return on equity of -252.25%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jianzhi Education Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xiaomi has higher upside potential than Jianzhi Education Technology Group, analysts believe Xiaomi is more attractive than Jianzhi Education Technology Group.

Xiaomi has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jianzhi Education Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jianzhi Education Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Jianzhi Education Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than Jianzhi Education Technology Group's net income of --. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.76x while Jianzhi Education Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 2.60x versus 0.31x for Jianzhi Education Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of -56.06%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -27.92%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $7.26 which suggests that it could fall by -27.2%. Given that Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues of $263.4M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$147.6M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.76x while Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 2.60x versus 2.38x for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNET Group has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of 14.98%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat VNET Group's return on equity of -33.59%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.62 which suggests that it could grow by 0.4%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of -0.244, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.424%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $296.2M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than VNET Group's net income of $44.4M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.76x while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 2.60x versus 1.24x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.