Is Apple Stock Undervalued or Overvalued?
For many years, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) was just about the perfect…
Buy
60
KC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$11.69
Seasonality move
:
2.03%
Day range:
$12.74 - $13.30
52-week range:
$2.02 - $22.26
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
2.90x
P/B ratio:
4.80x
Volume:
1.5M
Avg. volume:
2.8M
1-year change:
351.05%
Market cap:
$3.4B
Revenue:
$1.1B
EPS (TTM):
-$1.13
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
|
$302.7M | -$0.06 | 20.46% | -84.41% | $16.52 |
|
GDS
GDS Holdings
|
$377.9M | -$0.12 | -0.16% | -65.68% | $41.78 |
|
GMM
Global Mofy AI
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JFU
9F
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JZ
Jianzhi Education Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VNET
VNET Group
|
$307M | $0.01 | 12.87% | -96.91% | $13.78 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
|
$12.90 | $16.52 | $3.4B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.90x |
|
GDS
GDS Holdings
|
$27.14 | $41.78 | $5.3B | 8.32x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.65x |
|
GMM
Global Mofy AI
|
$2.92 | -- | $8.6M | 0.53x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
|
JFU
9F
|
$1.32 | -- | $15.5M | 9.05x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.02x |
|
JZ
Jianzhi Education Technology Group
|
$0.42 | -- | $11.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.28x |
|
VNET
VNET Group
|
$6.04 | $13.78 | $1.6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.46x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
|
42.92% | 4.368 | 20.28% | 0.49x |
|
GDS
GDS Holdings
|
58.59% | 0.285 | 93.04% | 1.29x |
|
GMM
Global Mofy AI
|
4.76% | -0.851 | 8.37% | 2.84x |
|
JFU
9F
|
-- | -0.039 | -- | 5.48x |
|
JZ
Jianzhi Education Technology Group
|
-- | -0.786 | -- | 1.14x |
|
VNET
VNET Group
|
64.71% | 3.309 | 119.15% | 0.37x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
|
$59.2M | -$6M | -22.9% | -29.94% | -6.39% | $79.5M |
|
GDS
GDS Holdings
|
$88.6M | $50.2M | 7.4% | 19.57% | 52.62% | -$31.5M |
|
GMM
Global Mofy AI
|
-- | -- | 59.3% | 65.29% | -- | -- |
|
JFU
9F
|
-- | -- | 0.22% | 0.22% | -- | -- |
|
JZ
Jianzhi Education Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -235.08% | -252.25% | -- | -- |
|
VNET
VNET Group
|
$70.2M | $32.9M | 1.05% | 2.74% | 7.21% | -$139.6M |
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KC or GDS?
GDS Holdings has a net margin of -8.82% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net margin of 28.02%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -29.94% beat GDS Holdings's return on equity of 19.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings19.08% -$0.10 $1.3B GDSGDS Holdings23.68% $0.47 $8.1B -
What do Analysts Say About KC or GDS?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.52, signalling upside risk potential of 41.72%. On the other hand GDS Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $41.78 which suggests that it could grow by 53.93%. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings5 2 0 GDSGDS Holdings10 3 0 -
Is KC or GDS More Risky?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.280, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.969%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KC or GDS?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GDS Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings pays out 1.58% of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KC or GDS?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues are $310.2M, which are smaller than GDS Holdings quarterly revenues of $374.3M. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$27.4M is lower than GDS Holdings's net income of $104.9M. Notably, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GDS Holdings's PE ratio is 8.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is 2.90x versus 3.65x for GDS Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings2.90x -- $310.2M -$27.4M GDSGDS Holdings3.65x 8.32x $374.3M $104.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns KC or GMM?
Global Mofy AI has a net margin of -8.82% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net margin of --. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -29.94% beat Global Mofy AI's return on equity of 65.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings19.08% -$0.10 $1.3B GMMGlobal Mofy AI-- -- $40.9M -
What do Analysts Say About KC or GMM?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.52, signalling upside risk potential of 41.72%. On the other hand Global Mofy AI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has higher upside potential than Global Mofy AI, analysts believe Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is more attractive than Global Mofy AI.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings5 2 0 GMMGlobal Mofy AI0 0 0 -
Is KC or GMM More Risky?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Mofy AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KC or GMM?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Mofy AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Mofy AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KC or GMM?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues are $310.2M, which are larger than Global Mofy AI quarterly revenues of --. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$27.4M is higher than Global Mofy AI's net income of --. Notably, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Mofy AI's PE ratio is 0.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is 2.90x versus 0.13x for Global Mofy AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings2.90x -- $310.2M -$27.4M GMMGlobal Mofy AI0.13x 0.53x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KC or JFU?
9F has a net margin of -8.82% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net margin of --. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -29.94% beat 9F's return on equity of 0.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings19.08% -$0.10 $1.3B JFU9F-- -- $496.2M -
What do Analysts Say About KC or JFU?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.52, signalling upside risk potential of 41.72%. On the other hand 9F has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13688.51%. Given that 9F has higher upside potential than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings, analysts believe 9F is more attractive than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings5 2 0 JFU9F0 0 0 -
Is KC or JFU More Risky?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 9F has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.768%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KC or JFU?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 9F offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 9F pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KC or JFU?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues are $310.2M, which are larger than 9F quarterly revenues of --. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$27.4M is higher than 9F's net income of --. Notably, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 9F's PE ratio is 9.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is 2.90x versus 0.02x for 9F. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings2.90x -- $310.2M -$27.4M JFU9F0.02x 9.05x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KC or JZ?
Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a net margin of -8.82% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net margin of --. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -29.94% beat Jianzhi Education Technology Group's return on equity of -252.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings19.08% -$0.10 $1.3B JZJianzhi Education Technology Group-- -- $7M -
What do Analysts Say About KC or JZ?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.52, signalling upside risk potential of 41.72%. On the other hand Jianzhi Education Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has higher upside potential than Jianzhi Education Technology Group, analysts believe Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is more attractive than Jianzhi Education Technology Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings5 2 0 JZJianzhi Education Technology Group0 0 0 -
Is KC or JZ More Risky?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KC or JZ?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jianzhi Education Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jianzhi Education Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KC or JZ?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues are $310.2M, which are larger than Jianzhi Education Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$27.4M is higher than Jianzhi Education Technology Group's net income of --. Notably, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jianzhi Education Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is 2.90x versus 0.28x for Jianzhi Education Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings2.90x -- $310.2M -$27.4M JZJianzhi Education Technology Group0.28x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KC or VNET?
VNET Group has a net margin of -8.82% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net margin of -0.49%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -29.94% beat VNET Group's return on equity of 2.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings19.08% -$0.10 $1.3B VNETVNET Group22.47% -$0.01 $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About KC or VNET?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.52, signalling upside risk potential of 41.72%. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of $13.78 which suggests that it could grow by 128.77%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings5 2 0 VNETVNET Group7 0 1 -
Is KC or VNET More Risky?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of 0.141, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.943%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KC or VNET?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KC or VNET?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues are $310.2M, which are smaller than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $312.2M. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$27.4M is lower than VNET Group's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is 2.90x versus 1.46x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings2.90x -- $310.2M -$27.4M VNETVNET Group1.46x -- $312.2M -$1.5M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will Palo Alto Networks Stock Be in 5 Years?
You know those companies that just refuse to slow down…
UPS Stock Forecast: Is the 6.9% Dividend Too Good to Be True?
Parcel delivery giant UPS (NYSE:UPS) has seen its fair share…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Buy
68
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
84
SBET alert for May 28
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 13.37% over the past day.
Buy
58
TNXP alert for May 28
Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding [TNXP] is down 1.76% over the past day.
Sell
37
ATS alert for May 28
ATS [ATS] is down 0.98% over the past day.
