GDS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

9F has a net margin of -6.49% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of --. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat 9F's return on equity of 0.22%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $42.59, signalling upside risk potential of 46.19%. On the other hand 9F has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12900.59%. Given that 9F has higher upside potential than GDS Holdings, analysts believe 9F is more attractive than GDS Holdings.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.280, which suggesting that the stock is 71.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 9F has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.768%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 9F offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays 1.58% of its earnings as a dividend. 9F pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374M, which are larger than 9F quarterly revenues of --. GDS Holdings's net income of $582.2M is higher than 9F's net income of --. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while 9F's PE ratio is 9.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 3.73x versus 0.02x for 9F. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a net margin of -6.49% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of --. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat Jianzhi Education Technology Group's return on equity of -252.25%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $42.59, signalling upside risk potential of 46.19%. On the other hand Jianzhi Education Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than Jianzhi Education Technology Group, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than Jianzhi Education Technology Group.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.280, which suggesting that the stock is 71.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jianzhi Education Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays 1.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Jianzhi Education Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374M, which are larger than Jianzhi Education Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. GDS Holdings's net income of $582.2M is higher than Jianzhi Education Technology Group's net income of --. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while Jianzhi Education Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 3.73x versus 0.31x for Jianzhi Education Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a net margin of -6.49% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of -8.82%. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -29.94%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $42.59, signalling upside risk potential of 46.19%. On the other hand Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $16.52 which suggests that it could grow by 18.06%. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.280, which suggesting that the stock is 71.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays 1.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374M, which are larger than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues of $310.2M. GDS Holdings's net income of $582.2M is higher than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$27.4M. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 3.73x versus 3.32x for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNET Group has a net margin of -6.49% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of -0.49%. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat VNET Group's return on equity of 2.74%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $42.59, signalling upside risk potential of 46.19%. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of $14.69 which suggests that it could grow by 103.19%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than GDS Holdings, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than GDS Holdings.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.280, which suggesting that the stock is 71.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of 0.141, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.943%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays 1.58% of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374M, which are larger than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $312.2M. GDS Holdings's net income of $582.2M is higher than VNET Group's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 3.73x versus 1.75x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.