VNET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GDS Holdings has a net margin of 14.98% compared to VNET Group's net margin of -6.49%. VNET Group's return on equity of -33.59% beat GDS Holdings's return on equity of -17.84%.

VNET Group has a consensus price target of $5.62, signalling upside risk potential of 0.4%. On the other hand GDS Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $24.80 which suggests that it could grow by 5.43%. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than VNET Group, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than VNET Group.

VNET Group has a beta of -0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 124.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.128, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.164%.

VNET Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GDS Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VNET Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings pays out -1.26% of its earnings as a dividend.

VNET Group quarterly revenues are $296.2M, which are smaller than GDS Holdings quarterly revenues of $414.2M. VNET Group's net income of $44.4M is higher than GDS Holdings's net income of -$26.9M. Notably, VNET Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GDS Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VNET Group is 1.24x versus 2.83x for GDS Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

9F has a net margin of 14.98% compared to VNET Group's net margin of --. VNET Group's return on equity of -33.59% beat 9F's return on equity of 0.22%.

VNET Group has a consensus price target of $5.62, signalling upside risk potential of 0.4%. On the other hand 9F has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11874.23%. Given that 9F has higher upside potential than VNET Group, analysts believe 9F is more attractive than VNET Group.

VNET Group has a beta of -0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 124.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 9F has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.998%.

VNET Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 9F offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VNET Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 9F pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VNET Group quarterly revenues are $296.2M, which are larger than 9F quarterly revenues of --. VNET Group's net income of $44.4M is higher than 9F's net income of --. Notably, VNET Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 9F's PE ratio is 9.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VNET Group is 1.24x versus 0.44x for 9F. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Aurora Mobile has a net margin of 14.98% compared to VNET Group's net margin of -3.27%. VNET Group's return on equity of -33.59% beat Aurora Mobile's return on equity of -21.95%.

VNET Group has a consensus price target of $5.62, signalling upside risk potential of 0.4%. On the other hand Aurora Mobile has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.15%. Given that Aurora Mobile has higher upside potential than VNET Group, analysts believe Aurora Mobile is more attractive than VNET Group.

VNET Group has a beta of -0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 124.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Mobile has a beta of 1.189, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.921%.

VNET Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurora Mobile offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VNET Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Mobile pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VNET Group quarterly revenues are $296.2M, which are larger than Aurora Mobile quarterly revenues of $11M. VNET Group's net income of $44.4M is higher than Aurora Mobile's net income of -$360.5K. Notably, VNET Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aurora Mobile's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VNET Group is 1.24x versus 0.91x for Aurora Mobile. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JinkoSolar Holding has a net margin of 14.98% compared to VNET Group's net margin of 0.09%. VNET Group's return on equity of -33.59% beat JinkoSolar Holding's return on equity of 1.65%.

VNET Group has a consensus price target of $5.62, signalling upside risk potential of 0.4%. On the other hand JinkoSolar Holding has an analysts' consensus of $35.08 which suggests that it could grow by 65.14%. Given that JinkoSolar Holding has higher upside potential than VNET Group, analysts believe JinkoSolar Holding is more attractive than VNET Group.

VNET Group has a beta of -0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 124.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JinkoSolar Holding has a beta of 0.299, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.054%.

VNET Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JinkoSolar Holding offers a yield of 14.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. VNET Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JinkoSolar Holding pays out 16.23% of its earnings as a dividend. JinkoSolar Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VNET Group quarterly revenues are $296.2M, which are smaller than JinkoSolar Holding quarterly revenues of $3.4B. VNET Group's net income of $44.4M is higher than JinkoSolar Holding's net income of $3.1M. Notably, VNET Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JinkoSolar Holding's PE ratio is 35.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VNET Group is 1.24x versus 0.08x for JinkoSolar Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.