WTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crescent Energy has a net margin of -30.42% compared to W&T Offshore's net margin of -1.34%. W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity of 1.6%.

W&T Offshore has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 506.06%. On the other hand Crescent Energy has an analysts' consensus of $17.80 which suggests that it could grow by 15.81%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Crescent Energy, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Crescent Energy.

W&T Offshore has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

W&T Offshore has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.42%. Crescent Energy offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. W&T Offshore pays 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Energy pays out 50.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W&T Offshore quarterly revenues are $121.4M, which are smaller than Crescent Energy quarterly revenues of $744.9M. W&T Offshore's net income of -$36.9M is lower than Crescent Energy's net income of -$9.9M. Notably, W&T Offshore's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crescent Energy's PE ratio is 18.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W&T Offshore is 0.45x versus 1.07x for Crescent Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -30.42% compared to W&T Offshore's net margin of 24.92%. W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68%.

W&T Offshore has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 506.06%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $214.33 which suggests that it could grow by 26.35%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

W&T Offshore has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.879, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.947%.

W&T Offshore has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.42%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 4.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. W&T Offshore pays 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W&T Offshore quarterly revenues are $121.4M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $2.6B. W&T Offshore's net income of -$36.9M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M. Notably, W&T Offshore's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W&T Offshore is 0.45x versus 3.28x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Oil & Gas has a net margin of -30.42% compared to W&T Offshore's net margin of 57.9%. W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3% beat Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 42.56%.

W&T Offshore has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 506.06%. On the other hand Northern Oil & Gas has an analysts' consensus of $48.79 which suggests that it could grow by 26.73%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Northern Oil & Gas, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Northern Oil & Gas.

W&T Offshore has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.848, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.78%.

W&T Offshore has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.42%. Northern Oil & Gas offers a yield of 4.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. W&T Offshore pays 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas pays out 13.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W&T Offshore quarterly revenues are $121.4M, which are smaller than Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues of $515.5M. W&T Offshore's net income of -$36.9M is lower than Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $298.4M. Notably, W&T Offshore's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northern Oil & Gas's PE ratio is 4.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W&T Offshore is 0.45x versus 1.80x for Northern Oil & Gas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vital Energy has a net margin of -30.42% compared to W&T Offshore's net margin of 46.88%. W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3% beat Vital Energy's return on equity of 17.64%.

W&T Offshore has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 506.06%. On the other hand Vital Energy has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.16%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Vital Energy, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Vital Energy.

W&T Offshore has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vital Energy has a beta of 3.161, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 216.1%.

W&T Offshore has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.42%. Vital Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. W&T Offshore pays 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Vital Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. W&T Offshore's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W&T Offshore quarterly revenues are $121.4M, which are smaller than Vital Energy quarterly revenues of $459.2M. W&T Offshore's net income of -$36.9M is lower than Vital Energy's net income of $215.3M. Notably, W&T Offshore's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vital Energy's PE ratio is 2.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W&T Offshore is 0.45x versus 0.63x for Vital Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.