CRGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 24.92%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 1.6% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $17.70, signalling upside risk potential of 18.95%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $215.17 which suggests that it could grow by 29.02%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Crescent Energy, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Crescent Energy.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.879, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.947%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.23%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 4.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Crescent Energy pays 50.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $744.9M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Crescent Energy's net income of -$9.9M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.15x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 1.03x versus 3.22x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Oil & Gas has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 57.9%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 1.6% beat Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 42.56%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $17.70, signalling upside risk potential of 18.95%. On the other hand Northern Oil & Gas has an analysts' consensus of $48.79 which suggests that it could grow by 29.22%. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than Crescent Energy, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than Crescent Energy.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.848, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.78%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.23%. Northern Oil & Gas offers a yield of 4.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Crescent Energy pays 50.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas pays out 13.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $744.9M, which are larger than Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues of $515.5M. Crescent Energy's net income of -$9.9M is lower than Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $298.4M. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.15x while Northern Oil & Gas's PE ratio is 4.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 1.03x versus 1.77x for Northern Oil & Gas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PrimeEnergy Resources has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 33.12%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 1.6% beat PrimeEnergy Resources's return on equity of 33.66%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $17.70, signalling upside risk potential of 18.95%. On the other hand PrimeEnergy Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Crescent Energy has higher upside potential than PrimeEnergy Resources, analysts believe Crescent Energy is more attractive than PrimeEnergy Resources.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PrimeEnergy Resources has a beta of 0.540, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.039%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.23%. PrimeEnergy Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crescent Energy pays 50.47% of its earnings as a dividend. PrimeEnergy Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $744.9M, which are larger than PrimeEnergy Resources quarterly revenues of $66.7M. Crescent Energy's net income of -$9.9M is lower than PrimeEnergy Resources's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.15x while PrimeEnergy Resources's PE ratio is 8.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 1.03x versus 2.50x for PrimeEnergy Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Range Resources has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 8.92%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 1.6% beat Range Resources's return on equity of 12.83%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $17.70, signalling upside risk potential of 18.95%. On the other hand Range Resources has an analysts' consensus of $35.60 which suggests that it could fall by -1.96%. Given that Crescent Energy has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe Crescent Energy is more attractive than Range Resources.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Resources has a beta of 1.815, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.5%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.23%. Range Resources offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Crescent Energy pays 50.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources pays out 8.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $744.9M, which are larger than Range Resources quarterly revenues of $567.9M. Crescent Energy's net income of -$9.9M is lower than Range Resources's net income of $50.7M. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.15x while Range Resources's PE ratio is 17.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 1.03x versus 3.72x for Range Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.