FANG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Devon Energy has a net margin of 24.92% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 20.18%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 26.79%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $215.17, signalling upside risk potential of 35.89%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $50.12 which suggests that it could grow by 60.63%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.885, which suggesting that the stock is 88.497% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 2.008, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.815%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.24%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 4.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 49.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M is lower than Devon Energy's net income of $812M. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 5.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 3.06x versus 1.25x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EOG Resources has a net margin of 24.92% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 28.53%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 24.93%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $215.17, signalling upside risk potential of 35.89%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $145.21 which suggests that it could grow by 20.6%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than EOG Resources, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than EOG Resources.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.885, which suggesting that the stock is 88.497% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.345%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.24%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 44.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M is lower than EOG Resources's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 9.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 3.06x versus 2.92x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 24.92% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 15.8%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 13.88%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $215.17, signalling upside risk potential of 35.89%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $62.14 which suggests that it could grow by 27.97%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.885, which suggesting that the stock is 88.497% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.575, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.474%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.24%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M is lower than Occidental Petroleum's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 12.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 3.06x versus 1.72x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 24.92% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 9.81%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 14.21%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $215.17, signalling upside risk potential of 35.89%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $130.14 which suggests that it could grow by 22.22%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.885, which suggesting that the stock is 88.497% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.004%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.24%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $87.8B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $8.6B. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 3.06x versus 1.32x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.