FANG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Devon Energy has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 14.51%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 21.75%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $202.83, signalling upside risk potential of 64.41%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $48.47 which suggests that it could grow by 65.36%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 1.521, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.067%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.17%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 4.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 32.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B is higher than Devon Energy's net income of $639M. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.81x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 6.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.39x versus 1.17x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EOG Resources has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 22.14%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 22.11%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $202.83, signalling upside risk potential of 64.41%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $141.26 which suggests that it could grow by 27.78%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than EOG Resources, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than EOG Resources.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.198%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.17%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 32.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B is lower than EOG Resources's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.81x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 9.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.39x versus 2.69x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of -1.88%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.38%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $202.83, signalling upside risk potential of 64.41%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $58.00 which suggests that it could grow by 43.08%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.519%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.17%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of -$127M. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.81x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 16.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.39x versus 1.47x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 9.39%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $202.83, signalling upside risk potential of 64.41%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $127.71 which suggests that it could grow by 23.36%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.482%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.17%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.81x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.39x versus 1.32x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.