CLMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Calumet's net margin of 24.92%. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68%.

Calumet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.33%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $214.33 which suggests that it could grow by 25.37%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Calumet, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Calumet.

Calumet has a beta of 1.900, which suggesting that the stock is 89.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.879, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.947%.

Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 4.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Calumet quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Calumet's net income of -$100.6M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.46x versus 3.30x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

North European Oil Royalty Trust has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Calumet's net margin of 78.59%. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat North European Oil Royalty Trust's return on equity of 554.51%.

Calumet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.33%. On the other hand North European Oil Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calumet has higher upside potential than North European Oil Royalty Trust, analysts believe Calumet is more attractive than North European Oil Royalty Trust.

Calumet has a beta of 1.900, which suggesting that the stock is 89.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison North European Oil Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.760, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.979%.

Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. North European Oil Royalty Trust offers a yield of 10.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. North European Oil Royalty Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Calumet quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than North European Oil Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $670.2K. Calumet's net income of -$100.6M is lower than North European Oil Royalty Trust's net income of $526.7K. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while North European Oil Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 8.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.46x versus 7.55x for North European Oil Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vital Energy has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Calumet's net margin of 46.88%. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat Vital Energy's return on equity of 17.64%.

Calumet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.33%. On the other hand Vital Energy has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.1%. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than Calumet, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than Calumet.

Calumet has a beta of 1.900, which suggesting that the stock is 89.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vital Energy has a beta of 3.161, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 216.1%.

Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vital Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vital Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Calumet quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Vital Energy quarterly revenues of $459.2M. Calumet's net income of -$100.6M is lower than Vital Energy's net income of $215.3M. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vital Energy's PE ratio is 2.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.46x versus 0.62x for Vital Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W&T Offshore has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Calumet's net margin of -30.42%. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3%.

Calumet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.33%. On the other hand W&T Offshore has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 468.18%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Calumet, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Calumet.

Calumet has a beta of 1.900, which suggesting that the stock is 89.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W&T Offshore has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.265%.

Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. W&T Offshore offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. W&T Offshore pays out 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. W&T Offshore's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Calumet quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than W&T Offshore quarterly revenues of $121.4M. Calumet's net income of -$100.6M is lower than W&T Offshore's net income of -$36.9M. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while W&T Offshore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.46x versus 0.48x for W&T Offshore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.