VTLE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crescent Energy has a net margin of 46.88% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of -1.34%. Vital Energy's return on equity of 17.64% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity of 1.6%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.16%. On the other hand Crescent Energy has an analysts' consensus of $17.80 which suggests that it could grow by 15.81%. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than Crescent Energy, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than Crescent Energy.

Vital Energy has a beta of 3.161, which suggesting that the stock is 216.1% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crescent Energy offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Energy pays out 50.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $459.2M, which are smaller than Crescent Energy quarterly revenues of $744.9M. Vital Energy's net income of $215.3M is higher than Crescent Energy's net income of -$9.9M. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.33x while Crescent Energy's PE ratio is 18.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.63x versus 1.07x for Crescent Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 46.88% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of 24.92%. Vital Energy's return on equity of 17.64% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.16%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $214.33 which suggests that it could grow by 26.35%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Vital Energy, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Vital Energy.

Vital Energy has a beta of 3.161, which suggesting that the stock is 216.1% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.879, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.947%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 4.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $459.2M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Vital Energy's net income of $215.3M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.33x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.63x versus 3.28x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HighPeak Energy has a net margin of 46.88% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of 18.39%. Vital Energy's return on equity of 17.64% beat HighPeak Energy's return on equity of 11.71%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.16%. On the other hand HighPeak Energy has an analysts' consensus of $22.75 which suggests that it could grow by 54.13%. Given that HighPeak Energy has higher upside potential than Vital Energy, analysts believe HighPeak Energy is more attractive than Vital Energy.

Vital Energy has a beta of 3.161, which suggesting that the stock is 216.1% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HighPeak Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HighPeak Energy offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy pays out 6.08% of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $459.2M, which are larger than HighPeak Energy quarterly revenues of $271.6M. Vital Energy's net income of $215.3M is higher than HighPeak Energy's net income of $49.9M. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.33x while HighPeak Energy's PE ratio is 11.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.63x versus 1.68x for HighPeak Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W&T Offshore has a net margin of 46.88% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of -30.42%. Vital Energy's return on equity of 17.64% beat W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.16%. On the other hand W&T Offshore has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 506.06%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Vital Energy, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Vital Energy.

Vital Energy has a beta of 3.161, which suggesting that the stock is 216.1% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W&T Offshore has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.265%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. W&T Offshore offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. W&T Offshore pays out 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. W&T Offshore's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $459.2M, which are larger than W&T Offshore quarterly revenues of $121.4M. Vital Energy's net income of $215.3M is higher than W&T Offshore's net income of -$36.9M. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.33x while W&T Offshore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.63x versus 0.45x for W&T Offshore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.