WRB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 15.48% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 11.68%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $65.26, signalling downside risk potential of -8.3%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $225.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.66%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.838%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.31x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.09x versus 0.86x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial has a net margin of 15.48% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 0.58%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $65.26, signalling downside risk potential of -8.3%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $48.00 which suggests that it could fall by -5.49%. Given that WR Berkley has more downside risk than CNA Financial, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.703%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $21M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.31x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 14.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.09x versus 0.99x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinsale Capital Group has a net margin of 15.48% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 26.47%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01% beat Kinsale Capital Group's return on equity of 32.24%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $65.26, signalling downside risk potential of -8.3%. On the other hand Kinsale Capital Group has an analysts' consensus of $474.11 which suggests that it could fall by -2.59%. Given that WR Berkley has more downside risk than Kinsale Capital Group, analysts believe Kinsale Capital Group is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinsale Capital Group has a beta of 1.157, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.714%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Kinsale Capital Group offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinsale Capital Group pays out 3.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Kinsale Capital Group quarterly revenues of $412.1M. WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M is higher than Kinsale Capital Group's net income of $109.1M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.31x while Kinsale Capital Group's PE ratio is 27.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.09x versus 7.15x for Kinsale Capital Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 15.48% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 17.33%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $65.26, signalling downside risk potential of -8.3%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $270.53 which suggests that it could grow by 2.3%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.825%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $12B. WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M is lower than The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.31x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 12.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.09x versus 1.32x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.