WRB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 10.83% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 24.7%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.53% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 24.78%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $63.73, signalling upside risk potential of 10.84%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $156.33 which suggests that it could grow by 9.85%. Given that WR Berkley has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe WR Berkley is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.544%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. WR Berkley pays 36.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $3.3B. WR Berkley's net income of $365.6M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $820M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.73x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 7.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.77x versus 1.85x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a net margin of 10.83% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 11.42%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.53% beat The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.63%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $63.73, signalling upside risk potential of 10.84%. On the other hand The Hartford Financial Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $129.29 which suggests that it could grow by 18.6%. Given that The Hartford Financial Services Group has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe The Hartford Financial Services Group is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.346%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. The Hartford Financial Services Group offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. WR Berkley pays 36.3% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays out 21.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues of $6.7B. WR Berkley's net income of $365.6M is lower than The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $767M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.73x while The Hartford Financial Services Group's PE ratio is 10.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.77x versus 1.27x for The Hartford Financial Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 10.83% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 11.84%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.53% beat Progressive's return on equity of 36.88%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $63.73, signalling upside risk potential of 10.84%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $277.5882 which suggests that it could grow by 14.57%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.411, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.864%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Progressive offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. WR Berkley pays 36.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $19.7B. WR Berkley's net income of $365.6M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.3B. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.73x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.77x versus 1.98x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RLI has a net margin of 10.83% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 20.22%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.53% beat RLI's return on equity of 27.72%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $63.73, signalling upside risk potential of 10.84%. On the other hand RLI has an analysts' consensus of $186.60 which suggests that it could grow by 19.38%. Given that RLI has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe RLI is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RLI has a beta of 0.475, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.537%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. RLI offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.29 per share. WR Berkley pays 36.3% of its earnings as a dividend. RLI pays out 45.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than RLI quarterly revenues of $470M. WR Berkley's net income of $365.6M is higher than RLI's net income of $95M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.73x while RLI's PE ratio is 17.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.77x versus 4.06x for RLI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.