RLI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a net margin of 15.51% compared to RLI's net margin of 13.2%. RLI's return on equity of 17.61% beat Heritage Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 27.99%.

RLI has a consensus price target of $78.25, signalling upside risk potential of 5.23%. On the other hand Heritage Insurance Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.67%. Given that Heritage Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than RLI, analysts believe Heritage Insurance Holdings is more attractive than RLI.

RLI has a beta of 0.721, which suggesting that the stock is 27.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heritage Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.203%.

RLI has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Heritage Insurance Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RLI pays 68.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Heritage Insurance Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. RLI's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RLI quarterly revenues are $407.7M, which are larger than Heritage Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues of $230.9M. RLI's net income of $63.2M is higher than Heritage Insurance Holdings's net income of $30.5M. Notably, RLI's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.46x while Heritage Insurance Holdings's PE ratio is 10.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RLI is 3.97x versus 0.93x for Heritage Insurance Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 15.51% compared to RLI's net margin of 12.58%. RLI's return on equity of 17.61% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

RLI has a consensus price target of $78.25, signalling upside risk potential of 5.23%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $293.8824 which suggests that it could grow by 4%. Given that RLI has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe RLI is more attractive than Progressive.

RLI has a beta of 0.721, which suggesting that the stock is 27.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.403, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.748%.

RLI has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. RLI pays 68.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RLI quarterly revenues are $407.7M, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. RLI's net income of $63.2M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, RLI's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.46x while Progressive's PE ratio is 19.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RLI is 3.97x versus 2.12x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 15.51% compared to RLI's net margin of 7.31%. RLI's return on equity of 17.61% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.75%.

RLI has a consensus price target of $78.25, signalling upside risk potential of 5.23%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -13.88%. Given that RLI has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe RLI is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

RLI has a beta of 0.721, which suggesting that the stock is 27.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.218, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.16%.

RLI has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. RLI pays 68.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RLI quarterly revenues are $407.7M, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $299.6M. RLI's net income of $63.2M is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, RLI's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.46x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RLI is 3.97x versus 1.05x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 15.51% compared to RLI's net margin of 11.84%. RLI's return on equity of 17.61% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93%.

RLI has a consensus price target of $78.25, signalling upside risk potential of 5.23%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $67.83 which suggests that it could fall by -5.37%. Given that RLI has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe RLI is more attractive than WR Berkley.

RLI has a beta of 0.721, which suggesting that the stock is 27.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.435, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.478%.

RLI has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. RLI pays 68.15% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RLI quarterly revenues are $407.7M, which are smaller than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.5B. RLI's net income of $63.2M is lower than WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M. Notably, RLI's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.46x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 16.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RLI is 3.97x versus 2.06x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.