CINF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 7.31%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.75%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $152.83, signalling upside risk potential of 4.42%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -11.11%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.776, which suggesting that the stock is 22.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.266, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.408%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $299.6M. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.96x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.10x versus 1.02x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 8.55%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.57%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $152.83, signalling upside risk potential of 4.42%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.67 which suggests that it could grow by 11.22%. Given that Selective Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Selective Insurance Group is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.776, which suggesting that the stock is 22.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.494, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.563%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $109.9M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.96x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 23.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.10x versus 1.05x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 5.35%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.6%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $152.83, signalling upside risk potential of 4.42%. On the other hand United Fire Group has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.64%. Given that United Fire Group has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.776, which suggesting that the stock is 22.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.069%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. United Fire Group offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than United Fire Group quarterly revenues of $331.1M. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than United Fire Group's net income of $17.7M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.96x while United Fire Group's PE ratio is 11.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.10x versus 0.56x for United Fire Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 11.84%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $152.83, signalling upside risk potential of 4.42%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $70.30 which suggests that it could fall by -4.08%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than WR Berkley.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.776, which suggesting that the stock is 22.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.426, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.398%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.96x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 17.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.10x versus 2.11x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.