TRV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 17.33% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 11.68%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $270.53, signalling upside risk potential of 2.3%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $225.41 which suggests that it could grow by 8.63%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.482, which suggesting that the stock is 51.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.838%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.59%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $12B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B is higher than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.32x versus 0.87x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury General has a net margin of 17.33% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 7.4%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17% beat Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $270.53, signalling upside risk potential of 2.3%. On the other hand Mercury General has an analysts' consensus of $80.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.48%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.482, which suggesting that the stock is 51.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury General has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.499%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.59%. Mercury General offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General pays out 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $12B, which are larger than Mercury General quarterly revenues of $1.4B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B is higher than Mercury General's net income of $101.1M. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while Mercury General's PE ratio is 6.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.32x versus 0.57x for Mercury General. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 17.33% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 11.63%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17% beat Progressive's return on equity of 35.88%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $270.53, signalling upside risk potential of 2.3%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $290.3529 which suggests that it could grow by 2.13%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than Progressive.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.482, which suggesting that the stock is 51.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.975%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.59%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.60 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $12B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.3B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.4B. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while Progressive's PE ratio is 19.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.32x versus 2.22x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 17.33% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 15.48%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $270.53, signalling upside risk potential of 2.3%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $65.26 which suggests that it could fall by -8.3%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than WR Berkley.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.482, which suggesting that the stock is 51.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.537%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.59%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $12B, which are larger than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.7B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B is higher than WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 16.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.32x versus 2.09x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.