CNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 7.97% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 24.7%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 13.39% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 24.78%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $50.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.38%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $156.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.29%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than CNA Financial.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.938% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.544%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. CNA Financial pays 65.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $3.3B. CNA Financial's net income of $283M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $820M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.79x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 7.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.93x versus 1.84x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loews has a net margin of 7.97% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 9.12%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 13.39% beat Loews's return on equity of 9.94%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $50.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.38%. On the other hand Loews has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -61.15%. Given that CNA Financial has higher upside potential than Loews, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than Loews.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.938% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loews has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.952%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. Loews offers a yield of 0.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CNA Financial pays 65.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews pays out 3.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Loews quarterly revenues of $4.4B. CNA Financial's net income of $283M is lower than Loews's net income of $401M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.79x while Loews's PE ratio is 10.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.93x versus 1.08x for Loews. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury General has a net margin of 7.97% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 15.09%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 13.39% beat Mercury General's return on equity of 34.73%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $50.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.38%. On the other hand Mercury General has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.12%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than CNA Financial.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.938% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury General has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.654%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. Mercury General offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. CNA Financial pays 65.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General pays out 73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Mercury General quarterly revenues of $1.5B. CNA Financial's net income of $283M is higher than Mercury General's net income of $230.9M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.79x while Mercury General's PE ratio is 6.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.93x versus 0.66x for Mercury General. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 7.97% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 10.59%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 13.39% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 18.55%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $50.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.38%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $263.58 which suggests that it could grow by 8.97%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than CNA Financial.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.938% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.647, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.297%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. CNA Financial pays 65.31% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 30.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.9B. CNA Financial's net income of $283M is lower than The Travelers Companies's net income of $1.3B. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.79x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 12.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.93x versus 1.23x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.