Why Did Bill Ackman Buy Uber Stock?
In February, Pershing Square manager Bill Ackman revealed that his…
Buy
54
CNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$47.25
Seasonality move
:
2.18%
Day range:
$47.70 - $48.17
52-week range:
$42.33 - $52.36
Dividend yield:
3.71%
P/E ratio:
13.64x
P/S ratio:
0.94x
P/B ratio:
1.24x
Volume:
288.9K
Avg. volume:
438.9K
1-year change:
8.55%
Market cap:
$13B
Revenue:
$14B
EPS (TTM):
$3.52
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNA
CNA Financial
|
$3.7B | $1.03 | 8.5% | -7.69% | $43.00 |
|
CINF
Cincinnati Financial
|
$2.7B | -$0.61 | 9.51% | -31.51% | $150.50 |
|
L
Loews
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGR
Progressive
|
$21.7B | $4.78 | 16.25% | 42.04% | $291.9412 |
|
PRA
ProAssurance
|
$272.8M | $0.20 | -3.37% | -25.33% | $20.33 |
|
WRB
WR Berkley
|
$3B | $0.99 | -7.24% | 13.35% | $67.43 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNA
CNA Financial
|
$48.01 | $43.00 | $13B | 13.64x | $2.46 | 3.71% | 0.94x |
|
CINF
Cincinnati Financial
|
$135.36 | $150.50 | $21.2B | 9.32x | $0.87 | 2.44% | 1.88x |
|
L
Loews
|
$86.24 | -- | $18.2B | 13.48x | $0.06 | 0.29% | 1.10x |
|
PGR
Progressive
|
$265.1900 | $291.9412 | $155.5B | 17.88x | $0.10 | 1.85% | 1.98x |
|
PRA
ProAssurance
|
$23.11 | $20.33 | $1.2B | 22.66x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.05x |
|
WRB
WR Berkley
|
$71.75 | $67.43 | $27.2B | 16.65x | $0.08 | 0.45% | 2.07x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNA
CNA Financial
|
22.05% | 0.450 | 22.69% | 22.94x |
|
CINF
Cincinnati Financial
|
5.53% | 0.854 | 3.63% | 851.88x |
|
L
Loews
|
34.39% | 0.303 | 46.94% | 147.51x |
|
PGR
Progressive
|
19.23% | 0.739 | 4.16% | 35.28x |
|
PRA
ProAssurance
|
26.12% | -1.829 | 52.2% | 29.87x |
|
WRB
WR Berkley
|
-- | 0.593 | -- | 43.28x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNA
CNA Financial
|
-- | -- | 7.25% | 9.46% | 1.47% | $665M |
|
CINF
Cincinnati Financial
|
-- | -- | 16.49% | 17.56% | 19.39% | $638M |
|
L
Loews
|
-- | -- | 5.27% | 8.14% | 6.67% | $767M |
|
PGR
Progressive
|
-- | -- | 27.01% | 34.35% | 16.2% | $2.9B |
|
PRA
ProAssurance
|
-- | -- | 3.33% | 4.55% | 8.47% | -$2.6M |
|
WRB
WR Berkley
|
-- | -- | 16.43% | 20.94% | 16.17% | $796.1M |
CNA Financial vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CNA or CINF?
Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 0.58% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 15.96%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNACNA Financial-- $0.07 $13.5B CINFCincinnati Financial-- $2.56 $14.8B -
What do Analysts Say About CNA or CINF?
CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling downside risk potential of -10.44%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $150.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.19%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than CNA Financial.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNACNA Financial0 0 0 CINFCincinnati Financial1 4 0 -
Is CNA or CINF More Risky?
CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, which suggesting that the stock is 52.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.533, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.747%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNA or CINF?
CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNA or CINF?
CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.5B. CNA Financial's net income of $21M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.64x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 9.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.94x versus 1.88x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNACNA Financial0.94x 13.64x $3.6B $21M CINFCincinnati Financial1.88x 9.32x $2.5B $405M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNA or L?
Loews has a net margin of 0.58% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 4.18%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46% beat Loews's return on equity of 8.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNACNA Financial-- $0.07 $13.5B LLoews-- $0.86 $26.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CNA or L?
CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling downside risk potential of -10.44%. On the other hand Loews has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -62.89%. Given that Loews has more downside risk than CNA Financial, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than Loews.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNACNA Financial0 0 0 LLoews0 0 0 -
Is CNA or L More Risky?
CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, which suggesting that the stock is 52.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loews has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.612%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNA or L?
CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Loews offers a yield of 0.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews pays out 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNA or L?
CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Loews quarterly revenues of $4.5B. CNA Financial's net income of $21M is lower than Loews's net income of $187M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.64x while Loews's PE ratio is 13.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.94x versus 1.10x for Loews. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNACNA Financial0.94x 13.64x $3.6B $21M LLoews1.10x 13.48x $4.5B $187M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNA or PGR?
Progressive has a net margin of 0.58% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 12.58%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNACNA Financial-- $0.07 $13.5B PGRProgressive-- $4.37 $35.8B -
What do Analysts Say About CNA or PGR?
CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling downside risk potential of -10.44%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $291.9412 which suggests that it could grow by 10.09%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than CNA Financial.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNACNA Financial0 0 0 PGRProgressive4 8 1 -
Is CNA or PGR More Risky?
CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, which suggesting that the stock is 52.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.975%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNA or PGR?
CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNA or PGR?
CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. CNA Financial's net income of $21M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.64x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.94x versus 1.98x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNACNA Financial0.94x 13.64x $3.6B $21M PGRProgressive1.98x 17.88x $20.4B $2.6B
-
Which has Higher Returns CNA or PRA?
ProAssurance has a net margin of 0.58% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 5.69%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46% beat ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNACNA Financial-- $0.07 $13.5B PRAProAssurance-- $0.31 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About CNA or PRA?
CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling downside risk potential of -10.44%. On the other hand ProAssurance has an analysts' consensus of $20.33 which suggests that it could fall by -12.02%. Given that ProAssurance has more downside risk than CNA Financial, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than ProAssurance.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNACNA Financial0 0 0 PRAProAssurance0 4 0 -
Is CNA or PRA More Risky?
CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, which suggesting that the stock is 52.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProAssurance has a beta of -0.088, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.754%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNA or PRA?
CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. ProAssurance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. ProAssurance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNA or PRA?
CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than ProAssurance quarterly revenues of $284.3M. CNA Financial's net income of $21M is higher than ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.64x while ProAssurance's PE ratio is 22.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.94x versus 1.05x for ProAssurance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNACNA Financial0.94x 13.64x $3.6B $21M PRAProAssurance1.05x 22.66x $284.3M $16.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNA or WRB?
WR Berkley has a net margin of 0.58% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 11.84%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNACNA Financial-- $0.07 $13.5B WRBWR Berkley-- $1.04 $8.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CNA or WRB?
CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling downside risk potential of -10.44%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $67.43 which suggests that it could fall by -6.02%. Given that CNA Financial has more downside risk than WR Berkley, analysts believe WR Berkley is more attractive than CNA Financial.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNACNA Financial0 0 0 WRBWR Berkley5 8 0 -
Is CNA or WRB More Risky?
CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, which suggesting that the stock is 52.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.537%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNA or WRB?
CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNA or WRB?
CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.5B. CNA Financial's net income of $21M is lower than WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.64x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 16.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.94x versus 2.07x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNACNA Financial0.94x 13.64x $3.6B $21M WRBWR Berkley2.07x 16.65x $3.5B $417.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Should You Buy Alibaba Stock Despite the Risks?
Markets rebounded slightly after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a…
Why Is Intel Struggling Against AMD?
Due to its disappointing reports, so-so management, and lack of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Buy
54
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.6T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
48
FI alert for Apr 25
Fiserv [FI] is up 0.33% over the past day.
Buy
66
FARO alert for Apr 25
Faro Technologies [FARO] is up 0.93% over the past day.
Buy
55
PI alert for Apr 25
Impinj [PI] is up 2.15% over the past day.
