PRA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 5.69% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of -3.51%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82%.

ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $20.33, signalling downside risk potential of -11.52%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $152.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.64%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than ProAssurance, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than ProAssurance.

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 95.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.386%.

ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are smaller than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.6B. ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M is higher than Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.53x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 15.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 1.04x versus 2.07x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial has a net margin of 5.69% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 0.58%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46%.

ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $20.33, signalling downside risk potential of -11.52%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could fall by -6.39%. Given that ProAssurance has more downside risk than CNA Financial, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than ProAssurance.

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 95.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.528, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.159%.

ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are smaller than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M is lower than CNA Financial's net income of $21M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.53x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 13.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 1.04x versus 0.94x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HCI Group has a net margin of 5.69% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 1.6%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55% beat HCI Group's return on equity of 24.85%.

ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $20.33, signalling downside risk potential of -11.52%. On the other hand HCI Group has an analysts' consensus of $158.25 which suggests that it could grow by 6.41%. Given that HCI Group has higher upside potential than ProAssurance, analysts believe HCI Group is more attractive than ProAssurance.

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 95.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCI Group has a beta of 1.235, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.542%.

ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HCI Group offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group pays out 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are larger than HCI Group quarterly revenues of $161.4M. ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M is higher than HCI Group's net income of $2.6M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.53x while HCI Group's PE ratio is 16.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 1.04x versus 2.41x for HCI Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 5.69% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 2.86%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.62%.

ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $20.33, signalling downside risk potential of -11.52%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.19%. Given that ProAssurance has more downside risk than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Safety Insurance Group is more attractive than ProAssurance.

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 95.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.218, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.16%.

ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are smaller than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $284.7M. ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $8.1M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.53x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 1.04x versus 1.04x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.