L Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Loews's net margin of 7.16%. Loews's return on equity of 9.94% beat Allstate's return on equity of 23.5%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -61.42%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $222.94 which suggests that it could grow by 19.84%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Loews, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.952% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.975%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Loews pays 3.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.6B. Loews's net income of $401M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.03x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.09x versus 0.79x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Loews's net margin of 24.7%. Loews's return on equity of 9.94% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 24.78%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -61.42%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $156.33 which suggests that it could grow by 9.85%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than Loews, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.952% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.544%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Loews pays 3.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Loews's net income of $401M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $820M. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.03x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 7.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.09x versus 1.85x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Loews's net margin of 7.97%. Loews's return on equity of 9.94% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 13.39%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -61.42%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.42%. Given that CNA Financial has higher upside potential than Loews, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.952% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.671, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.938%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Loews pays 3.98% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 65.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Loews's net income of $401M is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $283M. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.03x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 9.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.09x versus 0.93x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Loews's net margin of 11.84%. Loews's return on equity of 9.94% beat Progressive's return on equity of 36.88%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -61.42%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $277.5882 which suggests that it could grow by 14.57%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than Loews, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.952% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.411, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.864%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Progressive offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Loews pays 3.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $19.7B. Loews's net income of $401M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.3B. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.03x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.09x versus 1.98x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.