AFG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 11.87% compared to American Financial Group's net margin of 15.96%. American Financial Group's return on equity of 20.11% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56%.

American Financial Group has a consensus price target of $132.80, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $151.33 which suggests that it could grow by 12.41%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than American Financial Group, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than American Financial Group.

American Financial Group has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.813% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.533, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.747%.

American Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. American Financial Group pays 88.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Financial Group quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.5B. American Financial Group's net income of $255M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M. Notably, American Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.85x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Financial Group is 1.27x versus 1.87x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial has a net margin of 11.87% compared to American Financial Group's net margin of 0.58%. American Financial Group's return on equity of 20.11% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46%.

American Financial Group has a consensus price target of $132.80, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $48.00 which suggests that it could fall by -10.51%. Given that American Financial Group has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe American Financial Group is more attractive than CNA Financial.

American Financial Group has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.813% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.703%.

American Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. American Financial Group pays 88.84% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. American Financial Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

American Financial Group quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. American Financial Group's net income of $255M is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $21M. Notably, American Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.85x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 13.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Financial Group is 1.27x versus 0.94x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury General has a net margin of 11.87% compared to American Financial Group's net margin of 7.4%. American Financial Group's return on equity of 20.11% beat Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18%.

American Financial Group has a consensus price target of $132.80, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand Mercury General has an analysts' consensus of $80.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.83%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than American Financial Group, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than American Financial Group.

American Financial Group has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.813% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury General has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.499%.

American Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Mercury General offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. American Financial Group pays 88.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General pays out 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Financial Group quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Mercury General quarterly revenues of $1.4B. American Financial Group's net income of $255M is higher than Mercury General's net income of $101.1M. Notably, American Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.85x while Mercury General's PE ratio is 6.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Financial Group is 1.27x versus 0.54x for Mercury General. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 11.87% compared to American Financial Group's net margin of 15.48%. American Financial Group's return on equity of 20.11% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01%.

American Financial Group has a consensus price target of $132.80, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $66.26 which suggests that it could fall by -1.1%. Given that American Financial Group has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe American Financial Group is more attractive than WR Berkley.

American Financial Group has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.813% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.537%.

American Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. American Financial Group pays 88.84% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Financial Group quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.7B. American Financial Group's net income of $255M is lower than WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M. Notably, American Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.85x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 15.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Financial Group is 1.27x versus 1.97x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.