MCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American International Group has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 12.55%. Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18% beat American International Group's return on equity of -3.02%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.6%. On the other hand American International Group has an analysts' consensus of $87.72 which suggests that it could grow by 6.39%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than American International Group, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than American International Group.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.815, which suggesting that the stock is 18.499% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American International Group has a beta of 0.632, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.765%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. American International Group offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. American International Group pays out -72.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than American International Group quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Mercury General's net income of $101.1M is lower than American International Group's net income of $898M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.46x while American International Group's PE ratio is 11.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.55x versus 1.64x for American International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Allstate has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 11.68%. Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.6%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $224.29 which suggests that it could grow by 15.11%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Allstate, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Allstate.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.815, which suggesting that the stock is 18.499% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.838%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Mercury General's net income of $101.1M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.46x while Allstate's PE ratio is 11.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.55x versus 0.81x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 12.58%. Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.6%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $291.9412 which suggests that it could grow by 10.09%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Progressive.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.815, which suggesting that the stock is 18.499% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.975%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Mercury General's net income of $101.1M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.46x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.55x versus 1.98x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RLI has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 15.51%. Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18% beat RLI's return on equity of 17.61%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.6%. On the other hand RLI has an analysts' consensus of $78.25 which suggests that it could grow by 4.03%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than RLI, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than RLI.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.815, which suggesting that the stock is 18.499% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RLI has a beta of 0.490, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.971%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. RLI offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. RLI pays out 68.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than RLI quarterly revenues of $407.7M. Mercury General's net income of $101.1M is higher than RLI's net income of $63.2M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.46x while RLI's PE ratio is 24.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.55x versus 4.01x for RLI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.