WWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 9.75% compared to Woodward's net margin of 3.86%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.07% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $197.91, signalling upside risk potential of 13.31%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -7.19%. Given that Woodward has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, analysts believe Woodward is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures.

Woodward has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 38.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.339%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $854.5M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Woodward's net income of $83.3M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.06x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 3.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.26x versus 0.65x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ducommun has a net margin of 9.75% compared to Woodward's net margin of 5.04%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.07% beat Ducommun's return on equity of 4.61%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $197.91, signalling upside risk potential of 13.31%. On the other hand Ducommun has an analysts' consensus of $82.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.11%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 38.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ducommun has a beta of 1.416, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.586%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. Ducommun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Ducommun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $854.5M, which are larger than Ducommun quarterly revenues of $201.4M. Woodward's net income of $83.3M is higher than Ducommun's net income of $10.1M. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.06x while Ducommun's PE ratio is 32.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.26x versus 1.23x for Ducommun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 9.75% compared to Woodward's net margin of 7.33%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.07% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.41%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $197.91, signalling upside risk potential of 13.31%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $135.91 which suggests that it could grow by 17.3%. Given that RTX has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe RTX is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 38.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.837, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.306%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. RTX offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 101.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but RTX's is not.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $854.5M, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.1B. Woodward's net income of $83.3M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.06x while RTX's PE ratio is 33.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.26x versus 1.97x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Servotronics has a net margin of 9.75% compared to Woodward's net margin of -3.99%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.07% beat Servotronics's return on equity of 0.58%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $197.91, signalling upside risk potential of 13.31%. On the other hand Servotronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Woodward has higher upside potential than Servotronics, analysts believe Woodward is more attractive than Servotronics.

Woodward has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 38.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Servotronics has a beta of 0.505, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.519%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. Servotronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Servotronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $854.5M, which are larger than Servotronics quarterly revenues of $12.4M. Woodward's net income of $83.3M is higher than Servotronics's net income of -$496K. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.06x while Servotronics's PE ratio is 217.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.26x versus 0.58x for Servotronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.