ATRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Astronics's net margin of 3.86%. Astronics's return on equity of -6.41% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $23.33, signalling downside risk potential of -5.42%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.69%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than Astronics, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than Astronics.

Astronics has a beta of 1.737, which suggesting that the stock is 73.722% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.761%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $208.5M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Astronics's net income of -$2.8M is lower than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 2.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 1.09x versus 0.51x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ducommun has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Astronics's net margin of 3.43%. Astronics's return on equity of -6.41% beat Ducommun's return on equity of 4.79%.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $23.33, signalling downside risk potential of -5.42%. On the other hand Ducommun has an analysts' consensus of $82.20 which suggests that it could grow by 40.59%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Astronics, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Astronics.

Astronics has a beta of 1.737, which suggesting that the stock is 73.722% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ducommun has a beta of 1.557, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.656%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ducommun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ducommun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $208.5M, which are larger than Ducommun quarterly revenues of $197.3M. Astronics's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Ducommun's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ducommun's PE ratio is 27.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 1.09x versus 1.12x for Ducommun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leonardo DRS has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Astronics's net margin of 9.07%. Astronics's return on equity of -6.41% beat Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79%.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $23.33, signalling downside risk potential of -5.42%. On the other hand Leonardo DRS has an analysts' consensus of $37.50 which suggests that it could grow by 14.23%. Given that Leonardo DRS has higher upside potential than Astronics, analysts believe Leonardo DRS is more attractive than Astronics.

Astronics has a beta of 1.737, which suggesting that the stock is 73.722% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.983%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leonardo DRS offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leonardo DRS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $208.5M, which are smaller than Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues of $981M. Astronics's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leonardo DRS's PE ratio is 41.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 1.09x versus 2.72x for Leonardo DRS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Woodward has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Astronics's net margin of 11.27%. Astronics's return on equity of -6.41% beat Woodward's return on equity of 16.72%.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $23.33, signalling downside risk potential of -5.42%. On the other hand Woodward has an analysts' consensus of $205.13 which suggests that it could grow by 11.92%. Given that Woodward has higher upside potential than Astronics, analysts believe Woodward is more attractive than Astronics.

Astronics has a beta of 1.737, which suggesting that the stock is 73.722% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Woodward has a beta of 1.393, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.346%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Woodward offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward pays out 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $208.5M, which are smaller than Woodward quarterly revenues of $772.7M. Astronics's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Woodward's net income of $87.1M. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Woodward's PE ratio is 30.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 1.09x versus 3.43x for Woodward. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.