DRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of 3.86%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $37.50, signalling upside risk potential of 14.23%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.69%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than Leonardo DRS, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than Leonardo DRS.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.761%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $981M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.56x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 2.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 2.72x versus 0.51x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of 6.85%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.72%.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $37.50, signalling upside risk potential of 14.23%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $143.33 which suggests that it could grow by 8.82%. Given that Leonardo DRS has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Leonardo DRS is more attractive than RTX.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.687%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. RTX offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $981M, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $21.6B. Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.56x while RTX's PE ratio is 37.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 2.72x versus 2.19x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Servotronics has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of -13.31%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79% beat Servotronics's return on equity of -6.68%.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $37.50, signalling upside risk potential of 14.23%. On the other hand Servotronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Leonardo DRS has higher upside potential than Servotronics, analysts believe Leonardo DRS is more attractive than Servotronics.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Servotronics has a beta of 0.476, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.363%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Servotronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Servotronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $981M, which are larger than Servotronics quarterly revenues of $9.8M. Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M is higher than Servotronics's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.56x while Servotronics's PE ratio is 211.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 2.72x versus 0.59x for Servotronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triumph Group has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of 4.63%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79% beat Triumph Group's return on equity of --.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $37.50, signalling upside risk potential of 14.23%. On the other hand Triumph Group has an analysts' consensus of $22.22 which suggests that it could fall by -12.62%. Given that Leonardo DRS has higher upside potential than Triumph Group, analysts believe Leonardo DRS is more attractive than Triumph Group.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triumph Group has a beta of 2.626, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 162.606%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Triumph Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Triumph Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $981M, which are larger than Triumph Group quarterly revenues of $315.6M. Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M is higher than Triumph Group's net income of $14.6M. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.56x while Triumph Group's PE ratio is 3.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 2.72x versus 1.58x for Triumph Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.