DRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AeroVironment has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of -1.05%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 9.46% beat AeroVironment's return on equity of 3.93%.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.32%. On the other hand AeroVironment has an analysts' consensus of $195.38 which suggests that it could grow by 0.14%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than Leonardo DRS, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than Leonardo DRS.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.701% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AeroVironment has a beta of 0.809, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.085%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. AeroVironment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AeroVironment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $799M, which are larger than AeroVironment quarterly revenues of $167.6M. Leonardo DRS's net income of $50M is higher than AeroVironment's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.95x while AeroVironment's PE ratio is 165.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 3.70x versus 7.40x for AeroVironment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of -8.6%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 9.46% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 7.38%.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.32%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 36.99%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than Leonardo DRS, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than Leonardo DRS.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.701% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.156%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $799M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $15.4M. Leonardo DRS's net income of $50M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.95x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 20.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 3.70x versus 0.48x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Howmet Aerospace has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of 17.71%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 9.46% beat Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 28.27%.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.32%. On the other hand Howmet Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $169.87 which suggests that it could fall by -0.78%. Given that Leonardo DRS has more downside risk than Howmet Aerospace, analysts believe Howmet Aerospace is more attractive than Leonardo DRS.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.701% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.907%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. Howmet Aerospace offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace pays out 9.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $799M, which are smaller than Howmet Aerospace quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Leonardo DRS's net income of $50M is lower than Howmet Aerospace's net income of $344M. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.95x while Howmet Aerospace's PE ratio is 55.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 3.70x versus 9.28x for Howmet Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Servotronics has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of 1.09%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 9.46% beat Servotronics's return on equity of -4.61%.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.32%. On the other hand Servotronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Leonardo DRS has higher upside potential than Servotronics, analysts believe Leonardo DRS is more attractive than Servotronics.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.701% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Servotronics has a beta of 1.521, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.051%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. Servotronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Servotronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $799M, which are larger than Servotronics quarterly revenues of $11.7M. Leonardo DRS's net income of $50M is higher than Servotronics's net income of $128K. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.95x while Servotronics's PE ratio is 211.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 3.70x versus 2.59x for Servotronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.