AVAV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of -1.05% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 9.53%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 3.93% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $184.71, signalling upside risk potential of 10.87%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $524.23 which suggests that it could grow by 14.01%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than AeroVironment, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than AeroVironment.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.293, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.689%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18B. AeroVironment's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 141.19x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 19.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 6.32x versus 1.52x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocket Lab USA has a net margin of -1.05% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of -49.46%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 3.93% beat Rocket Lab USA's return on equity of -47.64%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $184.71, signalling upside risk potential of 10.87%. On the other hand Rocket Lab USA has an analysts' consensus of $25.65 which suggests that it could grow by 17.52%. Given that Rocket Lab USA has higher upside potential than AeroVironment, analysts believe Rocket Lab USA is more attractive than AeroVironment.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Lab USA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rocket Lab USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Lab USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are larger than Rocket Lab USA quarterly revenues of $122.6M. AeroVironment's net income of -$1.8M is higher than Rocket Lab USA's net income of -$60.6M. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 141.19x while Rocket Lab USA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 6.32x versus 23.41x for Rocket Lab USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of -1.05% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 7.56%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 3.93% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $184.71, signalling upside risk potential of 10.87%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $137.93 which suggests that it could grow by 5.52%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than RTX.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.563%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RTX offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. AeroVironment's net income of -$1.8M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 141.19x while RTX's PE ratio is 38.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 6.32x versus 2.15x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triumph Group has a net margin of -1.05% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 4.63%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 3.93% beat Triumph Group's return on equity of --.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $184.71, signalling upside risk potential of 10.87%. On the other hand Triumph Group has an analysts' consensus of $23.72 which suggests that it could fall by -7.52%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than Triumph Group, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than Triumph Group.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triumph Group has a beta of 2.462, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.156%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Triumph Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Triumph Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are smaller than Triumph Group quarterly revenues of $315.6M. AeroVironment's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Triumph Group's net income of $14.6M. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 141.19x while Triumph Group's PE ratio is 3.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 6.32x versus 1.60x for Triumph Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.