DCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Ducommun's net margin of -0.19%. Ducommun's return on equity of 5.26% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $81.40, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $216.53 which suggests that it could grow by 8.09%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Boeing, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Boeing.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.432, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.202%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $194.1M, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $19.5B. Ducommun's net income of $10.5M is higher than Boeing's net income of -$37M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.85x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.46x versus 1.97x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Ducommun's net margin of -8.6%. Ducommun's return on equity of 5.26% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 7.38%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $81.40, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 36.99%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than Ducommun, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than Ducommun.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.156%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $194.1M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $15.4M. Ducommun's net income of $10.5M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.85x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 20.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.46x versus 0.48x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Servotronics has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Ducommun's net margin of 1.09%. Ducommun's return on equity of 5.26% beat Servotronics's return on equity of -4.61%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $81.40, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Servotronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Servotronics, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Servotronics.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Servotronics has a beta of 1.521, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.051%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Servotronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Servotronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $194.1M, which are larger than Servotronics quarterly revenues of $11.7M. Ducommun's net income of $10.5M is higher than Servotronics's net income of $128K. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.85x while Servotronics's PE ratio is 211.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.46x versus 2.59x for Servotronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Woodward has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Ducommun's net margin of 12.33%. Ducommun's return on equity of 5.26% beat Woodward's return on equity of 17.01%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $81.40, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Woodward has an analysts' consensus of $222.03 which suggests that it could fall by -4.32%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Woodward.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Woodward has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.5%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Woodward offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward pays out 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $194.1M, which are smaller than Woodward quarterly revenues of $883.6M. Ducommun's net income of $10.5M is lower than Woodward's net income of $108.9M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.85x while Woodward's PE ratio is 37.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.46x versus 4.26x for Woodward. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.