VC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BorgWarner has a net margin of 6.96% compared to Visteon's net margin of 4.47%. Visteon's return on equity of 23.53% beat BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77%.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $93.08, signalling upside risk potential of 0.14%. On the other hand BorgWarner has an analysts' consensus of $37.77 which suggests that it could grow by 13.15%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Visteon.

Visteon has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.454% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BorgWarner has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.254%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BorgWarner offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner pays out 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $934M, which are smaller than BorgWarner quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Visteon's net income of $65M is lower than BorgWarner's net income of $157M. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.71x while BorgWarner's PE ratio is 26.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.67x versus 0.53x for BorgWarner. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ford Motor has a net margin of 6.96% compared to Visteon's net margin of 1.16%. Visteon's return on equity of 23.53% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 11.39%.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $93.08, signalling upside risk potential of 0.14%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $10.37 which suggests that it could fall by -1.5%. Given that Visteon has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Visteon is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Visteon has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.454% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.498, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.843%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 7.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $934M, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $40.7B. Visteon's net income of $65M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $471M. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.71x while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 8.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.67x versus 0.23x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors has a net margin of 6.96% compared to Visteon's net margin of 6.32%. Visteon's return on equity of 23.53% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $93.08, signalling upside risk potential of 0.14%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $54.15 which suggests that it could grow by 9.94%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Visteon.

Visteon has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.454% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.340, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.003%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $934M, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Visteon's net income of $65M is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.71x while General Motors's PE ratio is 6.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.67x versus 0.28x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lear has a net margin of 6.96% compared to Visteon's net margin of 1.45%. Visteon's return on equity of 23.53% beat Lear's return on equity of 9.86%.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $93.08, signalling upside risk potential of 0.14%. On the other hand Lear has an analysts' consensus of $103.08 which suggests that it could grow by 10.23%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than Visteon.

Visteon has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.454% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lear has a beta of 1.290, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.016%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lear offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear pays out 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $934M, which are smaller than Lear quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Visteon's net income of $65M is lower than Lear's net income of $80.7M. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.71x while Lear's PE ratio is 10.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.67x versus 0.23x for Lear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.