LEA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BorgWarner has a net margin of 2.43% compared to Lear's net margin of 6.79%. Lear's return on equity of 10.99% beat BorgWarner's return on equity of 14.58%.

Lear has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 34.4%. On the other hand BorgWarner has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.16%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than BorgWarner.

Lear has a beta of 1.448, which suggesting that the stock is 44.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BorgWarner has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.357%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. BorgWarner offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Lear pays 31.77% of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner pays out 20.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than BorgWarner quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Lear's net income of $135.8M is lower than BorgWarner's net income of $234M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.01x while BorgWarner's PE ratio is 8.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.23x versus 0.52x for BorgWarner. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dana has a net margin of 2.43% compared to Lear's net margin of 0.16%. Lear's return on equity of 10.99% beat Dana's return on equity of -0.89%.

Lear has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 34.4%. On the other hand Dana has an analysts' consensus of $14.88 which suggests that it could grow by 17.53%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than Dana, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than Dana.

Lear has a beta of 1.448, which suggesting that the stock is 44.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dana has a beta of 2.366, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.557%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Dana offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Lear pays 31.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Dana pays out 152.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dana's is not.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Dana quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Lear's net income of $135.8M is higher than Dana's net income of $4M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.01x while Dana's PE ratio is 135.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.23x versus 0.16x for Dana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dorman Products has a net margin of 2.43% compared to Lear's net margin of 10.97%. Lear's return on equity of 10.99% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 15.73%.

Lear has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 34.4%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4.54%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than Dorman Products.

Lear has a beta of 1.448, which suggesting that the stock is 44.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.875, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.519%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear pays 31.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $503.8M. Lear's net income of $135.8M is higher than Dorman Products's net income of $55.3M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.01x while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 22.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.23x versus 2.09x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strattec Security has a net margin of 2.43% compared to Lear's net margin of 2.66%. Lear's return on equity of 10.99% beat Strattec Security's return on equity of 7.17%.

Lear has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 34.4%. On the other hand Strattec Security has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.61%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than Strattec Security, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than Strattec Security.

Lear has a beta of 1.448, which suggesting that the stock is 44.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strattec Security has a beta of 1.155, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.46%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Strattec Security offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear pays 31.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Strattec Security pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Strattec Security quarterly revenues of $139.1M. Lear's net income of $135.8M is higher than Strattec Security's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.01x while Strattec Security's PE ratio is 10.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.23x versus 0.30x for Strattec Security. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.