BWA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -11.78% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of -23.71%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 5.55% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -16.73%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $37.57, signalling upside risk potential of 30.9%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 219.49%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than BorgWarner.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.210, which suggesting that the stock is 21.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.395, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.501%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $163.3M. BorgWarner's net income of -$405M is lower than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$38.7M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.10x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.46x versus 0.07x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dorman Products has a net margin of -11.78% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 10.21%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 5.55% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 15.65%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $37.57, signalling upside risk potential of 30.9%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of $144.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.38%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Dorman Products.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.210, which suggesting that the stock is 21.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.840, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.96%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $533.8M. BorgWarner's net income of -$405M is lower than Dorman Products's net income of $54.5M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.10x while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 20.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.46x versus 1.96x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -11.78% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of --. BorgWarner's return on equity of 5.55% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $37.57, signalling upside risk potential of 30.9%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.79%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.210, which suggesting that the stock is 21.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.597%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. BorgWarner's net income of -$405M is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.10x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.46x versus 143.72x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Modine Manufacturing has a net margin of -11.78% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 6.65%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 5.55% beat Modine Manufacturing's return on equity of 19.94%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $37.57, signalling upside risk potential of 30.9%. On the other hand Modine Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of $147.35 which suggests that it could grow by 72.51%. Given that Modine Manufacturing has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Modine Manufacturing is more attractive than BorgWarner.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.210, which suggesting that the stock is 21.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Modine Manufacturing has a beta of 2.480, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 148.001%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. Modine Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Modine Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Modine Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $616.8M. BorgWarner's net income of -$405M is lower than Modine Manufacturing's net income of $41M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.10x while Modine Manufacturing's PE ratio is 28.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.46x versus 1.81x for Modine Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.