ALSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gentex has a net margin of 21.99% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of 16.19%. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 49.86% beat Gentex's return on equity of 16.88%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $110.20, signalling upside risk potential of 14.64%. On the other hand Gentex has an analysts' consensus of $31.88 which suggests that it could grow by 31.2%. Given that Gentex has higher upside potential than Allison Transmission Holdings, analysts believe Gentex is more attractive than Allison Transmission Holdings.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.093% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentex has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.819%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Gentex offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex pays out 27.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $796M, which are larger than Gentex quarterly revenues of $541.6M. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $175M is higher than Gentex's net income of $87.7M. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.57x while Gentex's PE ratio is 13.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.63x versus 2.38x for Gentex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 21.99% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of --. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 49.86% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $110.20, signalling upside risk potential of 14.64%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.79%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Allison Transmission Holdings, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Allison Transmission Holdings.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.093% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.597%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Allison Transmission Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $796M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $175M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.57x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.63x versus 143.72x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Douglas Dynamics has a net margin of 21.99% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of 5.51%. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 49.86% beat Douglas Dynamics's return on equity of 23.2%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $110.20, signalling upside risk potential of 14.64%. On the other hand Douglas Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $33.67 which suggests that it could grow by 37.98%. Given that Douglas Dynamics has higher upside potential than Allison Transmission Holdings, analysts believe Douglas Dynamics is more attractive than Allison Transmission Holdings.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.093% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.165, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.509%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Douglas Dynamics offers a yield of 4.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Douglas Dynamics pays out 48.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $796M, which are larger than Douglas Dynamics quarterly revenues of $143.5M. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $175M is higher than Douglas Dynamics's net income of $7.9M. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.57x while Douglas Dynamics's PE ratio is 10.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.63x versus 1.00x for Douglas Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visteon has a net margin of 21.99% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of 12.99%. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 49.86% beat Visteon's return on equity of 22.69%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $110.20, signalling upside risk potential of 14.64%. On the other hand Visteon has an analysts' consensus of $107.54 which suggests that it could grow by 33.46%. Given that Visteon has higher upside potential than Allison Transmission Holdings, analysts believe Visteon is more attractive than Allison Transmission Holdings.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.093% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visteon has a beta of 1.395, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.508%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Visteon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Visteon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Allison Transmission Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $796M, which are smaller than Visteon quarterly revenues of $939M. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $175M is higher than Visteon's net income of $122M. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.57x while Visteon's PE ratio is 8.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.63x versus 0.58x for Visteon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.