LSTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 1.68%. Landstar System's return on equity of 18.09% beat Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's return on equity of 2.13%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $142.95, signalling upside risk potential of 2.99%. On the other hand Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $49.86 which suggests that it could grow by 13.74%. Given that Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings is more attractive than Landstar System.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.906% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a beta of 1.179, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.904%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Landstar System pays 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings pays out 88.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Landstar System's net income of $29.8M is lower than Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's net income of $30.6M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.49x while Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's PE ratio is 46.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.02x versus 0.96x for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marten Transport has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 1.94%. Landstar System's return on equity of 18.09% beat Marten Transport's return on equity of 2.82%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $142.95, signalling upside risk potential of 2.99%. On the other hand Marten Transport has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.81%. Given that Marten Transport has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Marten Transport is more attractive than Landstar System.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.906% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marten Transport has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.727%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Marten Transport offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Landstar System pays 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Marten Transport pays out 72.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Marten Transport quarterly revenues of $223.2M. Landstar System's net income of $29.8M is higher than Marten Transport's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.49x while Marten Transport's PE ratio is 49.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.02x versus 1.15x for Marten Transport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 18.52%. Landstar System's return on equity of 18.09% beat Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity of 27.13%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $142.95, signalling upside risk potential of 2.99%. On the other hand Old Dominion Freight Line has an analysts' consensus of $167.74 which suggests that it could grow by 2.15%. Given that Landstar System has higher upside potential than Old Dominion Freight Line, analysts believe Landstar System is more attractive than Old Dominion Freight Line.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.906% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.310, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.039%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Old Dominion Freight Line offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Landstar System pays 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 18.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Old Dominion Freight Line quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Landstar System's net income of $29.8M is lower than Old Dominion Freight Line's net income of $254.7M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.49x while Old Dominion Freight Line's PE ratio is 30.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.02x versus 6.17x for Old Dominion Freight Line. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Werner Enterprises has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Landstar System's net margin of -1.42%. Landstar System's return on equity of 18.09% beat Werner Enterprises's return on equity of 1.19%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $142.95, signalling upside risk potential of 2.99%. On the other hand Werner Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $27.29 which suggests that it could grow by 5.92%. Given that Werner Enterprises has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Werner Enterprises is more attractive than Landstar System.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.906% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Werner Enterprises has a beta of 1.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.401%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Werner Enterprises offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Landstar System pays 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Werner Enterprises pays out 102.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Landstar System's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Werner Enterprises's is not.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Werner Enterprises quarterly revenues of $712.1M. Landstar System's net income of $29.8M is higher than Werner Enterprises's net income of -$10.1M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.49x while Werner Enterprises's PE ratio is 88.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.02x versus 0.54x for Werner Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.