LSTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marten Transport has a net margin of 4.12% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 1.58%. Landstar System's return on equity of 20.52% beat Marten Transport's return on equity of 4.43%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $168.79, signalling downside risk potential of -3.13%. On the other hand Marten Transport has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could grow by 2.8%. Given that Marten Transport has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Marten Transport is more attractive than Landstar System.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.517% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marten Transport has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.733%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Marten Transport offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Landstar System pays 44.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Marten Transport pays out 27.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Marten Transport quarterly revenues of $237.4M. Landstar System's net income of $50M is higher than Marten Transport's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.89x while Marten Transport's PE ratio is 38.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.29x versus 1.31x for Marten Transport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 4.12% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 20.99%. Landstar System's return on equity of 20.52% beat Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity of 29.65%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $168.79, signalling downside risk potential of -3.13%. On the other hand Old Dominion Freight Line has an analysts' consensus of $197.53 which suggests that it could grow by 4.21%. Given that Old Dominion Freight Line has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Old Dominion Freight Line is more attractive than Landstar System.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.517% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.050, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.017%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Old Dominion Freight Line offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Landstar System pays 44.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 14.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Old Dominion Freight Line quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Landstar System's net income of $50M is lower than Old Dominion Freight Line's net income of $308.6M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.89x while Old Dominion Freight Line's PE ratio is 33.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.29x versus 6.97x for Old Dominion Freight Line. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Saia has a net margin of 4.12% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 11.01%. Landstar System's return on equity of 20.52% beat Saia's return on equity of 18.41%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $168.79, signalling downside risk potential of -3.13%. On the other hand Saia has an analysts' consensus of $517.11 which suggests that it could grow by 6.21%. Given that Saia has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Saia is more attractive than Landstar System.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.517% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Saia has a beta of 1.793, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.297%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Saia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Landstar System pays 44.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Saia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Landstar System's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Saia quarterly revenues of $842.1M. Landstar System's net income of $50M is lower than Saia's net income of $92.7M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.89x while Saia's PE ratio is 34.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.29x versus 4.11x for Saia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Werner Enterprises has a net margin of 4.12% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 0.88%. Landstar System's return on equity of 20.52% beat Werner Enterprises's return on equity of 3%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $168.79, signalling downside risk potential of -3.13%. On the other hand Werner Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $37.47 which suggests that it could grow by 2.1%. Given that Werner Enterprises has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Werner Enterprises is more attractive than Landstar System.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.517% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Werner Enterprises has a beta of 0.842, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.802%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Werner Enterprises offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Landstar System pays 44.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Werner Enterprises pays out 30.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Werner Enterprises quarterly revenues of $745.7M. Landstar System's net income of $50M is higher than Werner Enterprises's net income of $6.6M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.89x while Werner Enterprises's PE ratio is 50.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.29x versus 0.74x for Werner Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.