ASML Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.08% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 16.54%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 49.41% beat Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $946.35, signalling upside risk potential of 45.69%. On the other hand Applied Materials has an analysts' consensus of $206.3200 which suggests that it could grow by 49.25%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than ASML Holding NV, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than ASML Holding NV.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.668, which suggesting that the stock is 66.751% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Applied Materials has a beta of 1.609, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.887%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Applied Materials offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are larger than Applied Materials quarterly revenues of $7.2B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.9B is higher than Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.24x while Applied Materials's PE ratio is 18.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 8.37x versus 4.15x for Applied Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 29.08% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 26.8%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 49.41% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $946.35, signalling upside risk potential of 45.69%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $819.78 which suggests that it could grow by 24.82%. Given that ASML Holding NV has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe ASML Holding NV is more attractive than KLA.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.668, which suggesting that the stock is 66.751% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.998%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. KLA offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.9B is higher than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.24x while KLA's PE ratio is 27.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 8.37x versus 8.18x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lam Research has a net margin of 29.08% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 27.22%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 49.41% beat Lam Research's return on equity of 51.04%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $946.35, signalling upside risk potential of 45.69%. On the other hand Lam Research has an analysts' consensus of $95.58 which suggests that it could grow by 43.88%. Given that ASML Holding NV has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe ASML Holding NV is more attractive than Lam Research.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.668, which suggesting that the stock is 66.751% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lam Research has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.416%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Lam Research offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research pays out 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are larger than Lam Research quarterly revenues of $4.4B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.9B is higher than Lam Research's net income of $1.2B. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.24x while Lam Research's PE ratio is 20.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 8.37x versus 5.35x for Lam Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 29.08% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 34.62%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 49.41% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $946.35, signalling upside risk potential of 45.69%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $499.16 which suggests that it could grow by 30.89%. Given that ASML Holding NV has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe ASML Holding NV is more attractive than Microsoft.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.668, which suggesting that the stock is 66.751% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.29399999999999%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.9B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.24x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 30.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 8.37x versus 10.88x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.