AAPL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of 15.52% compared to Apple's net margin of -125.26%. Apple's return on equity of 140.28% beat Intel's return on equity of -14.47%.

Apple has a consensus price target of $246.26, signalling downside risk potential of -4.63%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 19.26%. Given that Intel has higher upside potential than Apple, analysts believe Intel is more attractive than Apple.

Apple has a beta of 1.228, which suggesting that the stock is 22.806% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.181%.

Apple has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Intel offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Apple pays 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out 182.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Apple's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Intel's is not.

Apple quarterly revenues are $94.9B, which are larger than Intel quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Apple's net income of $14.7B is higher than Intel's net income of -$16.6B. Notably, Apple's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.47x while Intel's PE ratio is 91.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple is 10.17x versus 1.61x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of 15.52% compared to Apple's net margin of 21.47%. Apple's return on equity of 140.28% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 8.71%.

Apple has a consensus price target of $246.26, signalling downside risk potential of -4.63%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $132.01 which suggests that it could grow by 47.86%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than Apple, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than Apple.

Apple has a beta of 1.228, which suggesting that the stock is 22.806% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.005%.

Apple has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Apple pays 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apple quarterly revenues are $94.9B, which are larger than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.7B. Apple's net income of $14.7B is higher than Micron Technology's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Apple's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.47x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 25.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple is 10.17x versus 3.47x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 15.52% compared to Apple's net margin of 55.04%. Apple's return on equity of 140.28% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

Apple has a consensus price target of $246.26, signalling downside risk potential of -4.63%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 23.24%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Apple, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Apple.

Apple has a beta of 1.228, which suggesting that the stock is 22.806% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

Apple has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Apple pays 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apple quarterly revenues are $94.9B, which are larger than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Apple's net income of $14.7B is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, Apple's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.47x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple is 10.17x versus 30.78x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of 15.52% compared to Apple's net margin of 6.65%. Apple's return on equity of 140.28% beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 33.98%.

Apple has a consensus price target of $246.26, signalling downside risk potential of -4.63%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $41.93 which suggests that it could grow by 22.13%. Given that Super Micro Computer has higher upside potential than Apple, analysts believe Super Micro Computer is more attractive than Apple.

Apple has a beta of 1.228, which suggesting that the stock is 22.806% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.097%.

Apple has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apple pays 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Apple's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apple quarterly revenues are $94.9B, which are larger than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Apple's net income of $14.7B is higher than Super Micro Computer's net income of $352.7M. Notably, Apple's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.47x while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 17.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple is 10.17x versus 1.38x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.