AMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 30.1% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 9.53%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 36.09% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.91%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $198.0381, signalling upside risk potential of 26.34%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $127.53 which suggests that it could grow by 15.18%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Advanced Micro Devices, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Advanced Micro Devices.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.712, which suggesting that the stock is 71.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.969, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.904%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Applied Materials's net income of $2.1B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $709M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.07x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 81.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.60x versus 6.52x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 30.1% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of -6.48%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 36.09% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $198.0381, signalling upside risk potential of 26.34%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.39 which suggests that it could grow by 5.63%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Intel.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.712, which suggesting that the stock is 71.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.441%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Intel offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Applied Materials's net income of $2.1B is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.07x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.60x versus 1.64x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 30.1% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 35.53%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 36.09% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $198.0381, signalling upside risk potential of 26.34%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $785.89 which suggests that it could grow by 1.54%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than KLA.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.712, which suggesting that the stock is 71.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.453%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. KLA offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $2.1B is higher than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.07x while KLA's PE ratio is 28.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.60x versus 9.01x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 30.1% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 11.02%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 36.09% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $198.0381, signalling upside risk potential of 26.34%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $91.80 which suggests that it could grow by 49.74%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Applied Materials.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.712, which suggesting that the stock is 71.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.826, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.607%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Applied Materials's net income of $2.1B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.07x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.60x versus 9.56x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.