Financhill
Buy
53

AMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$156.0000
Seasonality move :
4.56%
Day range:
$151.5100 - $156.2000
52-week range:
$123.7365 - $255.8900
Dividend yield:
1.03%
P/E ratio:
20.37x
P/S ratio:
4.68x
P/B ratio:
6.80x
Volume:
5.1M
Avg. volume:
8.5M
1-year change:
-24.85%
Market cap:
$126.6B
Revenue:
$27.2B
EPS (TTM):
$7.65

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AMAT
Applied Materials
$7.1B $2.31 7.12% 12.11% $201.7746
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
$7.1B $0.93 26.79% 431.51% $126.98
INTC
Intel
$12.3B $0.00 -7.22% -81.02% $21.58
KLAC
KLA
$3B $8.08 19.7% 38.17% $785.09
MRVL
Marvell Technology
$1.9B $0.61 61.87% -- $103.36
MU
Micron Technology
$7.9B $1.42 29.34% 426.1% $123.35
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AMAT
Applied Materials
$155.8100 $201.7746 $126.6B 20.37x $0.40 1.03% 4.68x
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
$100.36 $126.98 $162.7B 73.79x $0.00 0% 5.91x
INTC
Intel
$20.31 $21.58 $88.6B 95.83x $0.13 2.46% 1.65x
KLAC
KLA
$694.35 $785.09 $91.8B 25.24x $1.70 0.91% 8.08x
MRVL
Marvell Technology
$56.31 $103.36 $48.8B -- $0.06 0.43% 8.45x
MU
Micron Technology
$82.62 $123.35 $92.3B 19.81x $0.12 0.56% 2.99x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AMAT
Applied Materials
25.16% 1.421 4.49% 1.84x
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
6.71% 0.690 2.5% 1.77x
INTC
Intel
33.46% 0.799 47.44% 0.75x
KLAC
KLA
59.5% 1.170 6.54% 1.62x
MRVL
Marvell Technology
23.23% 2.491 4.16% 0.98x
MU
Micron Technology
19.18% 1.375 11.03% 1.87x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AMAT
Applied Materials
$3.5B $2.2B 26% 34.44% 30.46% $544M
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
$3.7B $806M 3.75% 3.91% 11.36% $727M
INTC
Intel
$4.7B -$145M -11.95% -17.53% -2.27% -$4.4B
KLAC
KLA
$1.9B $1.3B 37.5% 104.91% 43.63% $987.2M
MRVL
Marvell Technology
$917.4M $222.7M -4.87% -6.29% 13.47% $443.3M
MU
Micron Technology
$3B $1.8B 8.16% 10.22% 23.22% -$113M

Applied Materials vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or AMD?

    Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 9.53%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.91%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    48.79% $1.45 $24.9B
    AMD
    Advanced Micro Devices
    50.23% $0.44 $62B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or AMD?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $201.7746, signalling upside risk potential of 29.5%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $126.98 which suggests that it could grow by 26.52%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Advanced Micro Devices, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Advanced Micro Devices.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    21 10 1
    AMD
    Advanced Micro Devices
    25 17 1
  • Is AMAT or AMD More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.712, which suggesting that the stock is 71.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.969, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.904%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or AMD?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or AMD?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $709M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.37x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 73.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.68x versus 5.91x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    4.68x 20.37x $7.2B $1.2B
    AMD
    Advanced Micro Devices
    5.91x 73.79x $7.4B $709M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or INTC?

    Intel has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of -6.48%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    48.79% $1.45 $24.9B
    INTC
    Intel
    36.88% -$0.19 $156.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or INTC?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $201.7746, signalling upside risk potential of 29.5%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.58 which suggests that it could grow by 6.24%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Intel.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    21 10 1
    INTC
    Intel
    2 39 2
  • Is AMAT or INTC More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.712, which suggesting that the stock is 71.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.441%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or INTC?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Intel offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or INTC?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.37x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.68x versus 1.65x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    4.68x 20.37x $7.2B $1.2B
    INTC
    Intel
    1.65x 95.83x $12.7B -$821M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or KLAC?

    KLA has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 35.53%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    48.79% $1.45 $24.9B
    KLAC
    KLA
    61.62% $8.16 $9.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or KLAC?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $201.7746, signalling upside risk potential of 29.5%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $785.09 which suggests that it could grow by 13.07%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than KLA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    21 10 1
    KLAC
    KLA
    11 11 0
  • Is AMAT or KLAC More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.712, which suggesting that the stock is 71.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.453%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or KLAC?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. KLA offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or KLAC?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.37x while KLA's PE ratio is 25.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.68x versus 8.08x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    4.68x 20.37x $7.2B $1.2B
    KLAC
    KLA
    8.08x 25.24x $3.1B $1.1B
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or MRVL?

    Marvell Technology has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 11.02%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    48.79% $1.45 $24.9B
    MRVL
    Marvell Technology
    50.48% $0.23 $17.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or MRVL?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $201.7746, signalling upside risk potential of 29.5%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $103.36 which suggests that it could grow by 83.56%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Applied Materials.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    21 10 1
    MRVL
    Marvell Technology
    25 4 0
  • Is AMAT or MRVL More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.712, which suggesting that the stock is 71.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.826, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.607%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or MRVL?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or MRVL?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.37x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.68x versus 8.45x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    4.68x 20.37x $7.2B $1.2B
    MRVL
    Marvell Technology
    8.45x -- $1.8B $200.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or MU?

    Micron Technology has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 19.66%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 10.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    48.79% $1.45 $24.9B
    MU
    Micron Technology
    36.79% $1.41 $60.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or MU?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $201.7746, signalling upside risk potential of 29.5%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $123.35 which suggests that it could grow by 49.29%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than Applied Materials.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    21 10 1
    MU
    Micron Technology
    25 4 0
  • Is AMAT or MU More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.712, which suggesting that the stock is 71.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.842%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or MU?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or MU?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.37x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 19.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.68x versus 2.99x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    4.68x 20.37x $7.2B $1.2B
    MU
    Micron Technology
    2.99x 19.81x $8.1B $1.6B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is BYD a Threat To Tesla Shareholders?
Is BYD a Threat To Tesla Shareholders?

BYD (OTC:BYDDY) has rocketed to the top of China’s booming…

CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?
CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?

Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) are two of the…

Is it Safe to Invest in Google With OpenAI Threats?
Is it Safe to Invest in Google With OpenAI Threats?

For the last 20 years, Google parent company Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 8

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 10.54% over the past day.

Buy
92
TPB alert for May 8

Turning Point Brands [TPB] is down 6.67% over the past day.

Buy
74
LIVN alert for May 8

LivaNova PLC [LIVN] is up 1.33% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock