MSFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 17.09%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $505.93, signalling upside risk potential of 16.75%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $365.45 which suggests that it could grow by 31.35%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.813%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $10B. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.49x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 43.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 11.99x versus 7.15x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategy has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of -3797.18%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat Strategy's return on equity of -43.87%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $505.93, signalling upside risk potential of 16.75%. On the other hand Strategy has an analysts' consensus of $502.79 which suggests that it could grow by 28.11%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategy has a beta of 3.790, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 279.018%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Strategy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than Strategy quarterly revenues of $111.1M. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than Strategy's net income of -$4.2B. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.49x while Strategy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 11.99x versus 182.55x for Strategy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 20.78%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat Oracle's return on equity of 104.49%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $505.93, signalling upside risk potential of 16.75%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $178.12 which suggests that it could grow by 19.25%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.277, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.667%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than Oracle's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.49x while Oracle's PE ratio is 35.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 11.99x versus 7.65x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of -33.19%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -32.41%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $505.93, signalling upside risk potential of 16.75%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $195.17 which suggests that it could grow by 14.43%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Snowflake.

Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $986.8M. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$327.5M. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.49x while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 11.99x versus 15.65x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.