CRWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microsoft has a net margin of -1.67% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of 37.61%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of 4.89% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $376.13, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $508.55 which suggests that it could grow by 15.76%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.112, which suggesting that the stock is 11.217% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$16.8M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 717.24x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 24.32x versus 12.91x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Okta has a net margin of -1.67% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of 2.41%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of 4.89% beat Okta's return on equity of -0.65%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $376.13, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Okta has an analysts' consensus of $103.55 which suggests that it could grow by 24.47%. Given that Okta has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Okta is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.112, which suggesting that the stock is 11.217% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.076000000000009%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Okta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Okta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Okta quarterly revenues of $665M. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$16.8M is lower than Okta's net income of $16M. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 717.24x while Okta's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 24.32x versus 5.57x for Okta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of -1.67% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of 8.94%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of 4.89% beat Workday's return on equity of 20.33%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $376.13, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $292.30 which suggests that it could grow by 8.65%. Given that Workday has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Workday is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.112, which suggesting that the stock is 11.217% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.338%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$16.8M is lower than Workday's net income of $193M. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 717.24x while Workday's PE ratio is 44.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 24.32x versus 8.87x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zoom Communications has a net margin of -1.67% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of 17.58%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of 4.89% beat Zoom Communications's return on equity of 11.5%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $376.13, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Zoom Communications has an analysts' consensus of $91.60 which suggests that it could grow by 6.92%. Given that Zoom Communications has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Zoom Communications is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.112, which suggesting that the stock is 11.217% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zoom Communications has a beta of -0.029, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.897%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zoom Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zoom Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Zoom Communications quarterly revenues of $1.2B. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$16.8M is lower than Zoom Communications's net income of $207.1M. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 717.24x while Zoom Communications's PE ratio is 28.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 24.32x versus 5.82x for Zoom Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.