ORCL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Asana has a net margin of 20.78% compared to Oracle's net margin of -33.08%. Oracle's return on equity of 104.49% beat Asana's return on equity of -90.94%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $178.12, signalling upside risk potential of 19.25%. On the other hand Asana has an analysts' consensus of $15.38 which suggests that it could fall by -8.06%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Asana.

Oracle has a beta of 1.277, which suggesting that the stock is 27.667% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Asana has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Asana offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Asana pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Asana quarterly revenues of $188.3M. Oracle's net income of $2.9B is higher than Asana's net income of -$62.3M. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.06x while Asana's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 7.65x versus 5.30x for Asana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Salesforce has a net margin of 20.78% compared to Oracle's net margin of 17.09%. Oracle's return on equity of 104.49% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $178.12, signalling upside risk potential of 19.25%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $365.45 which suggests that it could grow by 31.35%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Oracle.

Oracle has a beta of 1.277, which suggesting that the stock is 27.667% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.813%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $10B. Oracle's net income of $2.9B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.06x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 43.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 7.65x versus 7.15x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 20.78% compared to Oracle's net margin of 36.86%. Oracle's return on equity of 104.49% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $178.12, signalling upside risk potential of 19.25%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $505.93 which suggests that it could grow by 16.75%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Microsoft.

Oracle has a beta of 1.277, which suggesting that the stock is 27.667% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.148%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Oracle's net income of $2.9B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.06x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 33.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 7.65x versus 11.99x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 20.78% compared to Oracle's net margin of 4.25%. Oracle's return on equity of 104.49% beat Workday's return on equity of 6.23%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $178.12, signalling upside risk potential of 19.25%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $299.06 which suggests that it could grow by 19.35%. Given that Workday has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Workday is more attractive than Oracle.

Oracle has a beta of 1.277, which suggesting that the stock is 27.667% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.297, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.683%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Oracle's net income of $2.9B is higher than Workday's net income of $94M. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.06x while Workday's PE ratio is 127.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 7.65x versus 7.99x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.