CRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microsoft has a net margin of 15.68% compared to Salesforce's net margin of 36.86%. Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Salesforce has a consensus price target of $354.08, signalling upside risk potential of 32.66%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $513.34 which suggests that it could grow by 7.2%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Microsoft.

Salesforce has a beta of 1.377, which suggesting that the stock is 37.665% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.397%.

Salesforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Salesforce pays 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Salesforce quarterly revenues are $9.8B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Salesforce's net income of $1.5B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Salesforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.77x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 37.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Salesforce is 6.71x versus 13.25x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Okta has a net margin of 15.68% compared to Salesforce's net margin of 9.01%. Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42% beat Okta's return on equity of 2.08%.

Salesforce has a consensus price target of $354.08, signalling upside risk potential of 32.66%. On the other hand Okta has an analysts' consensus of $123.32 which suggests that it could grow by 23.1%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Okta, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Okta.

Salesforce has a beta of 1.377, which suggesting that the stock is 37.665% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta has a beta of 0.841, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.946%.

Salesforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Okta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Salesforce pays 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Okta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Salesforce quarterly revenues are $9.8B, which are larger than Okta quarterly revenues of $688M. Salesforce's net income of $1.5B is higher than Okta's net income of $62M. Notably, Salesforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.77x while Okta's PE ratio is 159.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Salesforce is 6.71x versus 6.71x for Okta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies has a net margin of 15.68% compared to Salesforce's net margin of 15.4%. Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42% beat Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65%.

Salesforce has a consensus price target of $354.08, signalling upside risk potential of 32.66%. On the other hand Uber Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $96.65 which suggests that it could grow by 12.88%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Uber Technologies.

Salesforce has a beta of 1.377, which suggesting that the stock is 37.665% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.884%.

Salesforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Uber Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Salesforce pays 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Salesforce quarterly revenues are $9.8B, which are smaller than Uber Technologies quarterly revenues of $11.5B. Salesforce's net income of $1.5B is lower than Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Salesforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.77x while Uber Technologies's PE ratio is 14.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Salesforce is 6.71x versus 4.04x for Uber Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 15.68% compared to Salesforce's net margin of 3.04%. Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42% beat Workday's return on equity of 5.65%.

Salesforce has a consensus price target of $354.08, signalling upside risk potential of 32.66%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $297.62 which suggests that it could grow by 18.72%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Workday, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Workday.

Salesforce has a beta of 1.377, which suggesting that the stock is 37.665% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.596%.

Salesforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Salesforce pays 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Salesforce quarterly revenues are $9.8B, which are larger than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Salesforce's net income of $1.5B is higher than Workday's net income of $68M. Notably, Salesforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.77x while Workday's PE ratio is 138.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Salesforce is 6.71x versus 7.76x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.