OKTA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Okta's net margin of 22.02%. Okta's return on equity of 0.46% beat Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 24.76%.

Okta has a consensus price target of $118.86, signalling downside risk potential of -3.64%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems has an analysts' consensus of $320.19 which suggests that it could grow by 0.25%. Given that Cadence Design Systems has higher upside potential than Okta, analysts believe Cadence Design Systems is more attractive than Okta.

Okta has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.533%.

Okta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadence Design Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Okta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Okta quarterly revenues are $682M, which are smaller than Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Okta's net income of $23M is lower than Cadence Design Systems's net income of $273.6M. Notably, Okta's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,083.50x while Cadence Design Systems's PE ratio is 80.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okta is 8.31x versus 17.94x for Cadence Design Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Okta's net margin of -8.72%. Okta's return on equity of 0.46% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68%.

Okta has a consensus price target of $118.86, signalling downside risk potential of -3.64%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $411.55 which suggests that it could fall by -5.6%. Given that CrowdStrike Holdings has more downside risk than Okta, analysts believe Okta is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

Okta has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.220, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.019%.

Okta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Okta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Okta quarterly revenues are $682M, which are smaller than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Okta's net income of $23M is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M. Notably, Okta's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,083.50x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okta is 8.31x versus 27.40x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Okta's net margin of 36.86%. Okta's return on equity of 0.46% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Okta has a consensus price target of $118.86, signalling downside risk potential of -3.64%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $506.17 which suggests that it could grow by 11.75%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Okta, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Okta.

Okta has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.148%.

Okta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Okta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Okta quarterly revenues are $682M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Okta's net income of $23M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Okta's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,083.50x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 35.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okta is 8.31x versus 12.53x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qualys has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Okta's net margin of 29.73%. Okta's return on equity of 0.46% beat Qualys's return on equity of 40.21%.

Okta has a consensus price target of $118.86, signalling downside risk potential of -3.64%. On the other hand Qualys has an analysts' consensus of $135.95 which suggests that it could grow by 0.32%. Given that Qualys has higher upside potential than Okta, analysts believe Qualys is more attractive than Okta.

Okta has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qualys has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.397%.

Okta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qualys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Okta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qualys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Okta quarterly revenues are $682M, which are larger than Qualys quarterly revenues of $159.9M. Okta's net income of $23M is lower than Qualys's net income of $47.5M. Notably, Okta's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,083.50x while Qualys's PE ratio is 27.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okta is 8.31x versus 8.10x for Qualys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.