LRCX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Applied Materials has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 30.1%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat Applied Materials's return on equity of 36.09%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $90.60, signalling upside risk potential of 1.21%. On the other hand Applied Materials has an analysts' consensus of $197.9131 which suggests that it could grow by 16.02%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.656, which suggesting that the stock is 65.567% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Applied Materials has a beta of 1.673, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.272%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Applied Materials offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Applied Materials quarterly revenues of $7.1B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is lower than Applied Materials's net income of $2.1B. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.95x while Applied Materials's PE ratio is 20.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 6.78x versus 5.00x for Applied Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 9.53%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.91%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $90.60, signalling upside risk potential of 1.21%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $130.34 which suggests that it could grow by 12.21%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.656, which suggesting that the stock is 65.567% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.992, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.242%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $709M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.95x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 85.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 6.78x versus 6.84x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of -6.48%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $90.60, signalling upside risk potential of 1.21%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.29 which suggests that it could grow by 5.71%. Given that Intel has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe Intel is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.656, which suggesting that the stock is 65.567% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.905%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Intel offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.95x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 6.78x versus 1.63x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 35.53%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $90.60, signalling upside risk potential of 1.21%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $792.66 which suggests that it could fall by -8.65%. Given that Lam Research has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Lam Research is more attractive than KLA.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.656, which suggesting that the stock is 65.567% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.703%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. KLA offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is higher than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.95x while KLA's PE ratio is 31.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 6.78x versus 10.10x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.