LRCX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Applied Materials has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 16.54%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $90.11, signalling upside risk potential of 26.17%. On the other hand Applied Materials has an analysts' consensus of $202.7746 which suggests that it could grow by 33.8%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Applied Materials has a beta of 1.609, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.887%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Applied Materials offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Applied Materials quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is higher than Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.91x while Applied Materials's PE ratio is 19.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 5.41x versus 4.55x for Applied Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 6.29%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $90.11, signalling upside risk potential of 26.17%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $135.64 which suggests that it could grow by 40.35%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.664%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.91x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 97.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 5.41x versus 6.13x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of -6.48%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $90.11, signalling upside risk potential of 26.17%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.85 which suggests that it could grow by 8.98%. Given that Lam Research has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Lam Research is more attractive than Intel.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.94%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Intel offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.91x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 5.41x versus 1.63x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 28.19% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 26.8%. Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $90.11, signalling upside risk potential of 26.17%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $794.97 which suggests that it could grow by 14.45%. Given that Lam Research has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Lam Research is more attractive than KLA.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.998%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. KLA offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Lam Research's net income of $1.3B is higher than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.91x while KLA's PE ratio is 29.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 5.41x versus 8.65x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.