APPN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Inuvo has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Appian's net margin of -9.14%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $40.33, signalling upside risk potential of 14.88%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 65.74%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.607, which suggesting that the stock is 60.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.269%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Appian quarterly revenues are $154.1M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Appian's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 4.29x versus 1.02x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jamf Holding has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Appian's net margin of -7.69%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Jamf Holding's return on equity of -9.79%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $40.33, signalling upside risk potential of 14.88%. On the other hand Jamf Holding has an analysts' consensus of $22.67 which suggests that it could grow by 59.96%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.607, which suggesting that the stock is 60.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jamf Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jamf Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Appian quarterly revenues are $154.1M, which are smaller than Jamf Holding quarterly revenues of $159.3M. Appian's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Jamf Holding's net income of -$12.2M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jamf Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 4.29x versus 2.93x for Jamf Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Appian's net margin of 37.61%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $40.33, signalling upside risk potential of 14.88%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $508.46 which suggests that it could grow by 20.38%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.607, which suggesting that the stock is 60.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.896, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.413%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Appian quarterly revenues are $154.1M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. Appian's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 34.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 4.29x versus 12.41x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pegasystems has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Appian's net margin of -4.43%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Pegasystems's return on equity of 33.73%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $40.33, signalling upside risk potential of 14.88%. On the other hand Pegasystems has an analysts' consensus of $101.10 which suggests that it could grow by 7.61%. Given that Appian has higher upside potential than Pegasystems, analysts believe Appian is more attractive than Pegasystems.

Appian has a beta of 1.607, which suggesting that the stock is 60.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pegasystems has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.214%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pegasystems offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems pays out 14.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Appian quarterly revenues are $154.1M, which are smaller than Pegasystems quarterly revenues of $325.1M. Appian's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Pegasystems's net income of -$14.4M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pegasystems's PE ratio is 67.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 4.29x versus 5.54x for Pegasystems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.