INUV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Banzai International has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Inuvo's net margin of -389.92%. Inuvo's return on equity of -54% beat Banzai International's return on equity of --.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 141.24%. On the other hand Banzai International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1729.27%. Given that Banzai International has higher upside potential than Inuvo, analysts believe Banzai International is more attractive than Inuvo.

Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, which suggesting that the stock is 20.116% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Banzai International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Banzai International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Banzai International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $22.4M, which are larger than Banzai International quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Inuvo's net income of -$2M is higher than Banzai International's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Banzai International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.70x versus 0.13x for Banzai International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DHI Group has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Inuvo's net margin of -0.57%. Inuvo's return on equity of -54% beat DHI Group's return on equity of 1.28%.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 141.24%. On the other hand DHI Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 140.64%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than DHI Group, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than DHI Group.

Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, which suggesting that the stock is 20.116% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DHI Group has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.213%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DHI Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DHI Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $22.4M, which are smaller than DHI Group quarterly revenues of $35.3M. Inuvo's net income of -$2M is lower than DHI Group's net income of -$200K. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DHI Group's PE ratio is 52.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.70x versus 0.58x for DHI Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Inuvo's net margin of -6.7%. Inuvo's return on equity of -54% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 141.24%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.77%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Issuer Direct, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Issuer Direct.

Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, which suggesting that the stock is 20.116% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $22.4M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. Inuvo's net income of -$2M is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 57.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.70x versus 1.18x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NETSOL Technologies has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Inuvo's net margin of 0.49%. Inuvo's return on equity of -54% beat NETSOL Technologies's return on equity of 1.87%.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 141.24%. On the other hand NETSOL Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 207.69%. Given that NETSOL Technologies has higher upside potential than Inuvo, analysts believe NETSOL Technologies is more attractive than Inuvo.

Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, which suggesting that the stock is 20.116% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NETSOL Technologies has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.743%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NETSOL Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NETSOL Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $22.4M, which are larger than NETSOL Technologies quarterly revenues of $14.6M. Inuvo's net income of -$2M is lower than NETSOL Technologies's net income of $70.8K. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NETSOL Technologies's PE ratio is 39.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.70x versus 0.48x for NETSOL Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.