PEGA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innodata has a net margin of 17.96% compared to Pegasystems's net margin of 13.35%. Pegasystems's return on equity of 39.42% beat Innodata's return on equity of 73.59%.

Pegasystems has a consensus price target of $106.12, signalling upside risk potential of 7.36%. On the other hand Innodata has an analysts' consensus of $64.40 which suggests that it could grow by 64.33%. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than Pegasystems, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than Pegasystems.

Pegasystems has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innodata has a beta of 2.650, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.976%.

Pegasystems has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Innodata offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pegasystems pays 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Innodata pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pegasystems quarterly revenues are $475.6M, which are larger than Innodata quarterly revenues of $58.3M. Pegasystems's net income of $85.4M is higher than Innodata's net income of $7.8M. Notably, Pegasystems's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.98x while Innodata's PE ratio is 37.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pegasystems is 5.60x versus 6.19x for Innodata. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jamf Holding has a net margin of 17.96% compared to Pegasystems's net margin of 0.32%. Pegasystems's return on equity of 39.42% beat Jamf Holding's return on equity of -6.6%.

Pegasystems has a consensus price target of $106.12, signalling upside risk potential of 7.36%. On the other hand Jamf Holding has an analysts' consensus of $17.91 which suggests that it could grow by 89.11%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than Pegasystems, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than Pegasystems.

Pegasystems has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pegasystems has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Jamf Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pegasystems pays 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Jamf Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pegasystems quarterly revenues are $475.6M, which are larger than Jamf Holding quarterly revenues of $167.6M. Pegasystems's net income of $85.4M is higher than Jamf Holding's net income of $529K. Notably, Pegasystems's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.98x while Jamf Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pegasystems is 5.60x versus 1.90x for Jamf Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 17.96% compared to Pegasystems's net margin of 36.86%. Pegasystems's return on equity of 39.42% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Pegasystems has a consensus price target of $106.12, signalling upside risk potential of 7.36%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $514.34 which suggests that it could grow by 8.29%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Pegasystems, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Pegasystems.

Pegasystems has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.397%.

Pegasystems has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Pegasystems pays 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pegasystems quarterly revenues are $475.6M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Pegasystems's net income of $85.4M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Pegasystems's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.98x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pegasystems is 5.60x versus 13.14x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 17.96% compared to Pegasystems's net margin of 21.55%. Pegasystems's return on equity of 39.42% beat Oracle's return on equity of 85.26%.

Pegasystems has a consensus price target of $106.12, signalling upside risk potential of 7.36%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $209.50 which suggests that it could fall by -2.66%. Given that Pegasystems has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Pegasystems is more attractive than Oracle.

Pegasystems has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.494%.

Pegasystems has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Oracle offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Pegasystems pays 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 38.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pegasystems quarterly revenues are $475.6M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $15.9B. Pegasystems's net income of $85.4M is lower than Oracle's net income of $3.4B. Notably, Pegasystems's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.98x while Oracle's PE ratio is 49.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pegasystems is 5.60x versus 10.75x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.