VLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 6.7%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 9.81% beat Chevron's return on equity of 11.12%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $149.21, signalling upside risk potential of 13.49%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $176.89 which suggests that it could grow by 6.5%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than Chevron, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than Chevron.

Valero Energy has a beta of 1.364, which suggesting that the stock is 36.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 1.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.132%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Chevron offers a yield of 3.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.8B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $48.3B. Valero Energy's net income of $281M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.50x while Chevron's PE ratio is 17.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.33x versus 1.56x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 1.12%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 9.81% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 12.35%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $149.21, signalling upside risk potential of 13.49%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $166.37 which suggests that it could grow by 15.45%. Given that Marathon Petroleum has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Marathon Petroleum is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Valero Energy has a beta of 1.364, which suggesting that the stock is 36.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.425%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.8B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $33.1B. Valero Energy's net income of $281M is lower than Marathon Petroleum's net income of $371M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.50x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 14.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.33x versus 0.35x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 0.02%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 9.81% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 7%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $149.21, signalling upside risk potential of 13.49%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $139.55 which suggests that it could grow by 14.61%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Valero Energy has a beta of 1.364, which suggesting that the stock is 36.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.884%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.8B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $33.7B. Valero Energy's net income of $281M is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $8M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.50x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 24.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.33x versus 0.36x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 9.39%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 9.81% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $149.21, signalling upside risk potential of 13.49%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $128.98 which suggests that it could grow by 9.06%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Valero Energy has a beta of 1.364, which suggesting that the stock is 36.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.826, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.351%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.8B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Valero Energy's net income of $281M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.50x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 15.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.33x versus 1.50x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.