Financhill
Sell
40

PSX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$105.59
Seasonality move :
-1.57%
Day range:
$104.83 - $106.34
52-week range:
$91.01 - $150.12
Dividend yield:
4.36%
P/E ratio:
24.04x
P/S ratio:
0.32x
P/B ratio:
1.58x
Volume:
1.7M
Avg. volume:
3.3M
1-year change:
-27.31%
Market cap:
$43B
Revenue:
$143.2B
EPS (TTM):
$4.39

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PSX
Phillips 66
$32.1B -$0.72 -13.13% -30.97% $128.91
COP
ConocoPhillips
$15.9B $2.05 6.92% -18.16% $117.47
CVX
Chevron
$48.4B $2.15 -7.74% -23.46% $165.36
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
$30.1B -$0.54 -25.66% -24.27% $157.75
VLO
Valero Energy
$28.5B $0.41 -20.04% -27.5% $141.62
XOM
Exxon Mobil
$86.1B $1.74 -8.65% -29.61% $124.06
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PSX
Phillips 66
$105.55 $128.91 $43B 24.04x $1.15 4.36% 0.32x
COP
ConocoPhillips
$87.71 $117.47 $110.9B 11.26x $0.78 3.56% 1.89x
CVX
Chevron
$135.79 $165.36 $237.1B 15.52x $1.71 4.86% 1.26x
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
$144.69 $157.75 $44.5B 20.35x $0.91 2.4% 0.35x
VLO
Valero Energy
$117.00 $141.62 $36.6B 41.34x $1.13 3.71% 0.29x
XOM
Exxon Mobil
$104.71 $124.06 $451.3B 13.89x $0.99 3.71% 1.35x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PSX
Phillips 66
40.81% 1.209 36.58% 0.79x
COP
ConocoPhillips
26.52% -0.282 18.48% 1.06x
CVX
Chevron
-- 0.440 -- 0.71x
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
65.34% 0.855 59.8% 0.70x
VLO
Valero Energy
31.6% 0.797 24.56% 1.05x
XOM
Exxon Mobil
12.51% -0.040 7.23% 0.86x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PSX
Phillips 66
$2B -$395M 3.76% 6.28% 2.9% -$236M
COP
ConocoPhillips
$4.2B $3B 12.87% 17.57% 22.8% $1.1B
CVX
Chevron
$13.4B $4.3B 8.93% 11.12% 12.57% $1.3B
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
$1.4B $354M 4.44% 9.28% 2.28% -$727M
VLO
Valero Energy
$496M $231M 2.41% 3.35% -2.58% $703M
XOM
Exxon Mobil
$18.5B $9.8B 11% 12.7% 14.56% $7.1B

Phillips 66 vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PSX or COP?

    ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 16.2%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28% beat ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    6.5% $1.18 $47.2B
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    29.42% $1.90 $88.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About PSX or COP?

    Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $128.91, signalling upside risk potential of 22.13%. On the other hand ConocoPhillips has an analysts' consensus of $117.47 which suggests that it could grow by 33.93%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Phillips 66.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    8 5 0
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    13 3 0
  • Is PSX or COP More Risky?

    Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.349%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSX or COP?

    Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. ConocoPhillips offers a yield of 3.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Phillips 66 pays 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PSX or COP?

    Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are larger than ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues of $14.2B. Phillips 66's net income of $487M is lower than ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.04x while ConocoPhillips's PE ratio is 11.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.32x versus 1.89x for ConocoPhillips. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    0.32x 24.04x $30.4B $487M
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    1.89x 11.26x $14.2B $2.3B
  • Which has Higher Returns PSX or CVX?

    Chevron has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 7.59%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28% beat Chevron's return on equity of 11.12%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    6.5% $1.18 $47.2B
    CVX
    Chevron
    29% $2.00 $150.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About PSX or CVX?

    Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $128.91, signalling upside risk potential of 22.13%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $165.36 which suggests that it could grow by 21.78%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Chevron, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Chevron.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    8 5 0
    CVX
    Chevron
    8 8 1
  • Is PSX or CVX More Risky?

    Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.684%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSX or CVX?

    Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Phillips 66 pays 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PSX or CVX?

    Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $46.1B. Phillips 66's net income of $487M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.5B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.04x while Chevron's PE ratio is 15.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.32x versus 1.26x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    0.32x 24.04x $30.4B $487M
    CVX
    Chevron
    1.26x 15.52x $46.1B $3.5B
  • Which has Higher Returns PSX or MPC?

    Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of -0.24%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    6.5% $1.18 $47.2B
    MPC
    Marathon Petroleum
    4.33% -$0.24 $54B
  • What do Analysts Say About PSX or MPC?

    Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $128.91, signalling upside risk potential of 22.13%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $157.75 which suggests that it could grow by 9.03%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    8 5 0
    MPC
    Marathon Petroleum
    6 7 0
  • Is PSX or MPC More Risky?

    Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.254%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSX or MPC?

    Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Phillips 66 pays 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PSX or MPC?

    Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $31.5B. Phillips 66's net income of $487M is higher than Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.04x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 20.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.32x versus 0.35x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    0.32x 24.04x $30.4B $487M
    MPC
    Marathon Petroleum
    0.35x 20.35x $31.5B -$74M
  • Which has Higher Returns PSX or VLO?

    Valero Energy has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of -1.97%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    6.5% $1.18 $47.2B
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    1.64% -$1.90 $37.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About PSX or VLO?

    Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $128.91, signalling upside risk potential of 22.13%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $141.62 which suggests that it could grow by 20.73%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Valero Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    8 5 0
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    9 6 0
  • Is PSX or VLO More Risky?

    Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.044%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSX or VLO?

    Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. Phillips 66 pays 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PSX or VLO?

    Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are larger than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.3B. Phillips 66's net income of $487M is higher than Valero Energy's net income of -$595M. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.04x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 41.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.32x versus 0.29x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    0.32x 24.04x $30.4B $487M
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    0.29x 41.34x $30.3B -$595M
  • Which has Higher Returns PSX or XOM?

    Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 9.52%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    6.5% $1.18 $47.2B
    XOM
    Exxon Mobil
    22.81% $1.76 $307.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About PSX or XOM?

    Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $128.91, signalling upside risk potential of 22.13%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $124.06 which suggests that it could grow by 18.18%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    8 5 0
    XOM
    Exxon Mobil
    9 10 0
  • Is PSX or XOM More Risky?

    Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.105%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSX or XOM?

    Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Phillips 66 pays 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PSX or XOM?

    Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Phillips 66's net income of $487M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.04x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.32x versus 1.35x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    0.32x 24.04x $30.4B $487M
    XOM
    Exxon Mobil
    1.35x 13.89x $81.1B $7.7B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?
CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?

Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) are two of the…

Is it Safe to Invest in Google With OpenAI Threats?
Is it Safe to Invest in Google With OpenAI Threats?

For the last 20 years, Google parent company Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG,…

Is Broadcom Stock a Millionaire Maker?
Is Broadcom Stock a Millionaire Maker?

Broadcom (Nasdaq: AVGO) stock has gone up more than 64%…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 8

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 22.52% over the past day.

Buy
52
SRPT alert for May 8

Sarepta Therapeutics [SRPT] is down 21.54% over the past day.

Buy
74
LIVN alert for May 8

LivaNova PLC [LIVN] is up 23.38% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock