COP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 34.86%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $117.47, signalling upside risk potential of 33.93%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $183.26 which suggests that it could grow by 41.44%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than ConocoPhillips, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than ConocoPhillips.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.263%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.26x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 7.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.89x versus 2.44x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 1.12%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 12.35%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $117.47, signalling upside risk potential of 33.93%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $156.49 which suggests that it could grow by 8.26%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.254%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $33.1B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Marathon Petroleum's net income of $371M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.26x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 14.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.89x versus 0.36x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of -1.88%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.38%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $117.47, signalling upside risk potential of 33.93%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $49.39 which suggests that it could grow by 25.74%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 0.807, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.337%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of -$127M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.26x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 16.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.89x versus 1.42x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 1.6%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $117.47, signalling upside risk potential of 33.93%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $128.97 which suggests that it could grow by 22.37%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Phillips 66.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.212%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 4.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.26x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 24.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.89x versus 0.32x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.