COP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 29.06%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $128.56, signalling upside risk potential of 25.58%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $204.31 which suggests that it could grow by 29.69%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than ConocoPhillips, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than ConocoPhillips.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.901% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.902%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $3.7B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.14x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.21x versus 3.05x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 1.12%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 12.35%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $128.56, signalling upside risk potential of 25.58%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $166.37 which suggests that it could grow by 15.45%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.901% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.425%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $33.1B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Marathon Petroleum's net income of $371M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.14x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 14.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.21x versus 0.35x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of -1.88%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.38%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $128.56, signalling upside risk potential of 25.58%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $58.78 which suggests that it could grow by 20.38%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.901% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.512, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.174%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of -$127M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.14x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 20.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.21x versus 1.77x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 0.02%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 7%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $128.56, signalling upside risk potential of 25.58%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $139.55 which suggests that it could grow by 14.61%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Phillips 66.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.901% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.884%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $33.7B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $8M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.14x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 24.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.21x versus 0.36x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.