VFC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Movado Group has a net margin of -7.03% compared to VF's net margin of 1.08%. VF's return on equity of -12.45% beat Movado Group's return on equity of 3.39%.

VF has a consensus price target of $15.11, signalling upside risk potential of 21.29%. On the other hand Movado Group has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 94.44%. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than VF, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than VF.

VF has a beta of 1.684, which suggesting that the stock is 68.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Movado Group has a beta of 1.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.284%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Movado Group offers a yield of 8.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. VF pays -73.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Movado Group pays out 169.18% of its earnings as a dividend.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Movado Group quarterly revenues of $131.8M. VF's net income of -$150.8M is lower than Movado Group's net income of $1.4M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Movado Group's PE ratio is 20.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.51x versus 0.56x for Movado Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of -7.03% compared to VF's net margin of 7.6%. VF's return on equity of -12.45% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 29.99%.

VF has a consensus price target of $15.11, signalling upside risk potential of 21.29%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $308.24 which suggests that it could grow by 11.36%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

VF has a beta of 1.684, which suggesting that the stock is 68.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.445, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.509%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. VF pays -73.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 27.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $1.7B. VF's net income of -$150.8M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $129M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 23.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.51x versus 2.50x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TJX Companies has a net margin of -7.03% compared to VF's net margin of 7.9%. VF's return on equity of -12.45% beat TJX Companies's return on equity of 59.85%.

VF has a consensus price target of $15.11, signalling upside risk potential of 21.29%. On the other hand TJX Companies has an analysts' consensus of $138.96 which suggests that it could grow by 9.5%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than TJX Companies, analysts believe VF is more attractive than TJX Companies.

VF has a beta of 1.684, which suggesting that the stock is 68.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TJX Companies has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.323%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. TJX Companies offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. VF pays -73.88% of its earnings as a dividend. TJX Companies pays out 33.88% of its earnings as a dividend. TJX Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than TJX Companies quarterly revenues of $13.1B. VF's net income of -$150.8M is lower than TJX Companies's net income of $1B. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TJX Companies's PE ratio is 29.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.51x versus 2.53x for TJX Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Under Armour has a net margin of -7.03% compared to VF's net margin of -5.71%. VF's return on equity of -12.45% beat Under Armour's return on equity of -10.24%.

VF has a consensus price target of $15.11, signalling upside risk potential of 21.29%. On the other hand Under Armour has an analysts' consensus of $7.45 which suggests that it could grow by 10.95%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Under Armour.

VF has a beta of 1.684, which suggesting that the stock is 68.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Under Armour has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.812%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Under Armour offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VF pays -73.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Under Armour pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Under Armour quarterly revenues of $1.2B. VF's net income of -$150.8M is lower than Under Armour's net income of -$67.5M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Under Armour's PE ratio is 12.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.51x versus 0.56x for Under Armour. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.