UAA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lucid Group has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -496.14%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -71.79%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $10.89, signalling upside risk potential of 32.86%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could fall by -10.52%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.697, which suggesting that the stock is 69.685% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $200M. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$992.5M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.67x versus 9.70x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nike has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 9.41%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Nike's return on equity of 34.51%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $10.89, signalling upside risk potential of 32.86%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $86.78 which suggests that it could grow by 22.49%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Nike.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.697, which suggesting that the stock is 69.685% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.588%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nike offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $12.4B. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is lower than Nike's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Nike's PE ratio is 21.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.67x versus 2.18x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 8.57%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.02%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $10.89, signalling upside risk potential of 32.86%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $238.31 which suggests that it could fall by -0.9%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.697, which suggesting that the stock is 69.685% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.851%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is higher than Ralph Lauren's net income of $147.9M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 22.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.67x versus 2.32x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 8.61%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $10.89, signalling upside risk potential of 32.86%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.53 which suggests that it could fall by -28.6%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Tesla.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.697, which suggesting that the stock is 69.685% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.123%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Tesla's PE ratio is 116.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.67x versus 15.32x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.