UAA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nike has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 9.41%. Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29% beat Nike's return on equity of 34.51%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 38.23%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $85.95 which suggests that it could grow by 18.32%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Nike.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.634, which suggesting that the stock is 63.439% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.019, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.898%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nike offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $12.4B. Under Armour's net income of $1.2M is lower than Nike's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Nike's PE ratio is 22.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.58x versus 2.24x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 13.88%. Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.48%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 38.23%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $292.13 which suggests that it could grow by 34.82%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.634, which suggesting that the stock is 63.439% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.258%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Under Armour's net income of $1.2M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $297.4M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 19.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.58x versus 2.01x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 9.17%. Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 38.23%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $343.39 which suggests that it could grow by 42.68%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Under Armour.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.634, which suggesting that the stock is 63.439% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Under Armour's net income of $1.2M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Tesla's PE ratio is 117.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.58x versus 8.62x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VF has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 5.92%. Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29% beat VF's return on equity of -27.74%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 38.23%. On the other hand VF has an analysts' consensus of $26.27 which suggests that it could grow by 61.15%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Under Armour.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.634, which suggesting that the stock is 63.439% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VF has a beta of 1.469, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.935%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VF offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VF pays out -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than VF quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Under Armour's net income of $1.2M is lower than VF's net income of $167.8M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while VF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.58x versus 0.62x for VF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.