UAA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Movado Group has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 3.84%. Under Armour's return on equity of -10.24% beat Movado Group's return on equity of 3.66%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $7.45, signalling upside risk potential of 10.79%. On the other hand Movado Group has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 94.33%. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than Under Armour.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Movado Group has a beta of 1.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.284%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Movado Group offers a yield of 8.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Movado Group pays out 169.18% of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Movado Group quarterly revenues of $174.7M. Under Armour's net income of -$67.5M is lower than Movado Group's net income of $6.7M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Movado Group's PE ratio is 18.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.57x versus 0.56x for Movado Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nike has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 7.05%. Under Armour's return on equity of -10.24% beat Nike's return on equity of 31.91%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $7.45, signalling upside risk potential of 10.79%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $73.36 which suggests that it could grow by 19.4%. Given that Nike has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe Nike is more attractive than Under Armour.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.917%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nike offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $11.3B. Under Armour's net income of -$67.5M is lower than Nike's net income of $794M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Nike's PE ratio is 20.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.57x versus 1.92x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 7.6%. Under Armour's return on equity of -10.24% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 29.99%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $7.45, signalling upside risk potential of 10.79%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $306.07 which suggests that it could grow by 10.2%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.445, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.509%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 27.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Under Armour's net income of -$67.5M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $129M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 23.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.57x versus 2.51x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VF has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -7.03%. Under Armour's return on equity of -10.24% beat VF's return on equity of -12.45%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $7.45, signalling upside risk potential of 10.79%. On the other hand VF has an analysts' consensus of $15.11 which suggests that it could grow by 17.61%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Under Armour.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VF has a beta of 1.684, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.415%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VF offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VF pays out -73.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than VF quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Under Armour's net income of -$67.5M is higher than VF's net income of -$150.8M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while VF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.57x versus 0.52x for VF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.