KMX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genuine Parts has a net margin of 1.5% compared to CarMax's net margin of 3.31%. CarMax's return on equity of 8.11% beat Genuine Parts's return on equity of 18.88%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $84.13, signalling upside risk potential of 24.03%. On the other hand Genuine Parts has an analysts' consensus of $131.36 which suggests that it could grow by 6.53%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Genuine Parts, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Genuine Parts.

CarMax has a beta of 1.380, which suggesting that the stock is 37.989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genuine Parts has a beta of 0.766, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.399%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genuine Parts offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genuine Parts pays out 61.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Genuine Parts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Genuine Parts quarterly revenues of $5.9B. CarMax's net income of $89.9M is lower than Genuine Parts's net income of $194.4M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.13x while Genuine Parts's PE ratio is 20.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.40x versus 0.73x for Genuine Parts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Group 1 Automotive has a net margin of 1.5% compared to CarMax's net margin of 2.33%. CarMax's return on equity of 8.11% beat Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 16.4%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $84.13, signalling upside risk potential of 24.03%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $463.88 which suggests that it could grow by 4.81%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Group 1 Automotive, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Group 1 Automotive.

CarMax has a beta of 1.380, which suggesting that the stock is 37.989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.572%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Group 1 Automotive offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive pays out 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues of $5.5B. CarMax's net income of $89.9M is lower than Group 1 Automotive's net income of $128.1M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.13x while Group 1 Automotive's PE ratio is 12.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.40x versus 0.28x for Group 1 Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Openlane has a net margin of 1.5% compared to CarMax's net margin of 8.02%. CarMax's return on equity of 8.11% beat Openlane's return on equity of 9.57%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $84.13, signalling upside risk potential of 24.03%. On the other hand Openlane has an analysts' consensus of $23.83 which suggests that it could fall by -1.11%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Openlane, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Openlane.

CarMax has a beta of 1.380, which suggesting that the stock is 37.989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Openlane has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.45%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Openlane offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane pays out 40.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Openlane quarterly revenues of $460.1M. CarMax's net income of $89.9M is higher than Openlane's net income of $36.9M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.13x while Openlane's PE ratio is 41.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.40x versus 1.43x for Openlane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of 1.5% compared to CarMax's net margin of -11.23%. CarMax's return on equity of 8.11% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -51.41%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $84.13, signalling upside risk potential of 24.03%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -71.1%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

CarMax has a beta of 1.380, which suggesting that the stock is 37.989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of 0.276, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.352%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $28.7M. CarMax's net income of $89.9M is higher than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.13x while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.40x versus 3.29x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.