CVNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CarGurus has a net margin of 5.1% compared to Carvana's net margin of 17.34%. Carvana's return on equity of 61.46% beat CarGurus's return on equity of 7.91%.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $282.21, signalling downside risk potential of -7.63%. On the other hand CarGurus has an analysts' consensus of $38.92 which suggests that it could grow by 15.69%. Given that CarGurus has higher upside potential than Carvana, analysts believe CarGurus is more attractive than Carvana.

Carvana has a beta of 3.606, which suggesting that the stock is 260.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarGurus has a beta of 1.445, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.546%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarGurus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarGurus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than CarGurus quarterly revenues of $225.2M. Carvana's net income of $216M is higher than CarGurus's net income of $39M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 107.20x while CarGurus's PE ratio is 96.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 2.81x versus 3.95x for CarGurus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of 5.1% compared to Carvana's net margin of 1.5%. Carvana's return on equity of 61.46% beat CarMax's return on equity of 8.11%.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $282.21, signalling downside risk potential of -7.63%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $84.19 which suggests that it could grow by 24.14%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Carvana, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Carvana.

Carvana has a beta of 3.606, which suggesting that the stock is 260.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.448, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.765%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6B. Carvana's net income of $216M is higher than CarMax's net income of $89.9M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 107.20x while CarMax's PE ratio is 21.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 2.81x versus 0.40x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 5.1% compared to Carvana's net margin of -43.95%. Carvana's return on equity of 61.46% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $282.21, signalling downside risk potential of -7.63%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.34 which suggests that it could fall by -3.22%. Given that Carvana has more downside risk than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Carvana.

Carvana has a beta of 3.606, which suggesting that the stock is 260.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Carvana's net income of $216M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 107.20x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 2.81x versus 3.12x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 5.1% compared to Carvana's net margin of 2.12%. Carvana's return on equity of 61.46% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $282.21, signalling downside risk potential of -7.63%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $290.36 which suggests that it could fall by -13.09%. Given that Tesla has more downside risk than Carvana, analysts believe Carvana is more attractive than Tesla.

Carvana has a beta of 3.606, which suggesting that the stock is 260.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Carvana's net income of $216M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 107.20x while Tesla's PE ratio is 183.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 2.81x versus 12.24x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.